We talked about this on Sundays Contractor call but I wanted to post it here for the masses. I have a property under contract. Original plan was buy at $182k, put roughly $80k into rehab, and rent by the room for about $4k/month. That version means I pay utilities, deal with management, vacancy, and higher ongoing reserves. If I BRRRR it, I’d have little or no cash left in the deal, but lower ongoing cash flow, infinite CoC on paper, and a higher-value property (with higher taxes). Now there’s an as-is option. Current rent is around $2k/month. A national sober living group will take it on a multi-year lease. That cuts out day-to-day management and vacancy. I’d still need CapEx and maintenance reserves (higher if I skip the full reno), but the operational load drops a lot. This path leaves a minimum of ~$40k cash in the deal and currently pencils to about a 10% CoC — short of my 12% target today, but a proposed rent increase in six months could get it there. On a 30-year note at 7.5% the payment lands roughly $1,000–$1,150 depending on down payment. At $2k the note is covered with room for reserves. The rehab/BRRRR path gets to ~$4k but adds the $80k, utilities, management costs, more moving parts, and less residual cash flow after the refinance. The original plan wasn’t crazy — it was a way to push income, improve the asset, and recycle capital. The simpler path also clears basic underwriting with less effort, less operational risk, and still a respectable return. For those of you who underwrite deals like this: Would you stick with the BRRRR / rent-by-the-room plan for the infinite CoC and higher value, or take the multi-year as-is lease, leave ~$40k in, and accept the ~10% CoC (with upside to 12% soon)? What would tip it one way or the other for you?