If you've been integrating Claude Code into your daily stack, you already know how powerful it is. But until now, there was one massive friction point: you were chained to your local machine. ​Anthropic just fixed that by rolling out the Remote Control feature, and it completely shifts how we can deploy and interact with these agents. ​I spent the morning tearing down the update and testing the boundaries. Here are my notes on what this actually means for builders: ​⚡ The Big Shift (Flexibility): You can now securely connect to and command your Claude Code environment from anywhere. It transitions Claude from being just a "local dev assistant" into a true remote operator. You can manage complex workflows while on the go. ​⚙️ The Setup Reality: It’s not just a simple toggle switch. Getting it running requires a very specific and secure configuration. You have to be intentional about how you expose your environment so you don't leave your machine vulnerable to the open web. ​🚧 The Catch (Limitations): While it's a game-changer, there is a learning curve. When you aren't staring directly at your local directory, things like session persistence and absolute file path referencing become much more critical. If you aren't careful, you'll run into execution errors. ​Overall, if you are managing projects remotely or want more flexibility in your AI operations, this is the exact update we’ve been waiting for. ​Question for the AI operators here: How many of you have integrated CLI-based AI agents (like Claude Code or Devin) into your actual workflows?

Genuine question for agency owners building with n8n + Claude Code right now: When you clone a workflow for a new client… What actually changes? -The API keys? -The prompts? -The data source? -The logic? All of the above? Most of us are: * Building a stack * Getting it working for one client * Duplicating it * Tweaking it * Shipping Which is smart. But here’s the quiet question: As those tweaks pile up… Do you actually know what’s different between Client A and Client B? If Claude’s behavior shifts… If you refine a prompt… If you adjust a node to fix one edge case… Are you upgrading the “template”? Or just patching one clone? I’m building in the same ecosystem. Just noticing that everyone’s focused on getting agents working… Very few are thinking about how reusable systems evolve or get versioned over time. Curious how you’re handling versioning across client stacks right now.