From $40K AI projects and first clients to custom CRMs, AI operating systems, and production-ready automations, another week inside AIS+ proved that consistent building keeps creating opportunities. 🚀 Standout Wins of the Week inside AIS+ 👉 @Kobe Shemesh closed a $40K upfront AI project after refining his Claude Code workflow, proving that small improvements in execution can create massive business results. 👉 @Galyn Fergerson landed her first client just 6 days into AIS+, turning a discovery call into a $750 AI OS project before even finishing the automation course. 👉 @Girish Mohan built an AI Scrum Master that now prioritizes his calendar, tasks, and deals automatically—helping him execute every day with more focus. 👉 William Rendall was promoted to AI Workstream Strategy Lead less than three months after joining AIS+, crediting the community for accelerating his growth. 👉 Diane McCracken celebrated her 100th Claude Code session at 68 years old, showing that curiosity and consistency matter far more than experience. ⸻ 🎥 Super Win Spotlight | @Ahmad Abd Alkarim Ahmad joined AIS+ with years of leadership experience but wanted a better way to turn ideas into action. Today, his custom AI Operating System helps him manage projects, analyze business problems, and support his team without slowing anyone down. His biggest lesson? Don't just watch. Build. Practice. Share what you learn. That's where the real return comes from. 🎥 Watch Ahmad's story 👇 ✨ Every week, members are turning ideas into systems, skills into businesses, and momentum into real opportunities. Step inside AI Automation Society Plus and start building assets, systems, and skills that compound 🚀

I've challenged myself to build something new with Fable 5 every day until July 7th. This project focused on 2 things that I am unfamiliar with: Church Online Technology and CRMs. I grew up in a small church all my life and even served on the tech team there. My main responsibilities were more about in-house technology. Things like showing lyrics or changing audio levels. I don't really know how a CRM would work in a church like mine. Its small and the pastor was able to visit with each person individually. But with a large church, that might be hard for a pastor to meet with every person every Sunday. But that doesn't mean that the pastor can't be present. This Church CRM focuses on tending to the needs of the church and recognizing patterns to allow the pastor to reach out and be involved beyond just Sundays. At this stage, it is just a pastor's dashboard, but there is plenty of room for expansion and some features are already outlined to easily work with other users. Core features: - When someone fills out a connect card, their information can be uploaded to the CRM - The CRM tracks things like attendance, important dates, and volunteers - Can create tasks to remind you to reach out - This CRM allows people to sign up for an event and volunteers - Members can fill out prayer cards for a Prayer Team - The ability to send messages to individuals, groups, or the whole congregation Just an idea I was messing around with. I don't really know the practical applications of it because I didn't grow up in a church that needed anything like this. If this is helpful for you or you have any advice for how to make a CRM work in a church setting, let me know.

Hi everyone! 👋 I’m excited to share my Day 1 win: building my first newsletter using Claude Code. I learned a ton through the process—how Claude Code works, what goes into creating a newsletter from scratch, and where there’s room for improvement. Since this was my first time building something like this, it was a great hands-on experience. Honestly, I’m pretty impressed with how capable the AI is. The result turned out better than I expected—but as a beginner, I’m sure I’ve missed things I could improve. I’d really appreciate any feedback or suggestions on how I can make the newsletter better. Thanks in advance! 🙌

Claude Code Advisor — Simple Explanation Advisor is like calling a stronger consultant inside Claude Code. You can work with a main model, like Sonnet, and use a stronger model, like Opus or Fable, only when the task gets difficult. The idea is simple: The cheaper model executes. The stronger model advises when needed. Use Advisor for difficult bugs, large projects, refactoring, architecture decisions, repeated errors, or final checks. Example: claude --advisor opus Or inside Claude Code: /advisor opus Then you can ask: Fix the errors in this project. Before making major changes, use the advisor to validate the strategy. Sonnet will do the work, but it can call Opus when it needs a better opinion. For very critical diagnosis, you can use: claude --advisor fable Use Fable when you want to find hidden bugs, architecture risks, and problems that common models may miss. To turn it off: /advisor off Simple rule: Use Sonnet alone for normal work. Use Sonnet with Opus Advisor for safer work. Use Sonnet with Fable Advisor for difficult diagnosis. Use opusplan for initial planning. Use subagents for parallel execution. The main point: Advisor is not the executor. Advisor is the specialist that helps when the decision is difficult. Recommended use: claude --advisor opus For very important projects: claude --advisor fable Ideal flow: Sonnet works. Opus or Fable helps on the critical points. https://code.claude.com/docs/en/advisor

For Day 6, I scheduled my lead finder workflow to run automatically on a recurring schedule. The task looks for local businesses that may benefit from automation or website improvements and adds the results to a Google Sheet so I have a fresh list of leads to review. I used a scheduled task instead of a loop because this is something I want to run on a recurring basis, not just something I need Claude to monitor temporarily in one active session. A loop makes more sense for short-term monitoring, but a scheduled task is better for a weekly lead generation routine. One thing that surprised me was how much this starts to feel like having a lightweight agent working in the background. Instead of me opening the project, running the script, checking the output, and updating the sheet manually, the task can handle the routine on its own. The biggest takeaway for me was understanding the difference between loops and scheduled tasks. Loops are great for active project monitoring, but scheduled tasks are where the real recurring business automation starts to click. #AISChallenge