Is anti-fragility still necessary to be successful?
šš¢šš¤ šš§š šš«šØš¦š©š ššØ šš§š¬š°šš« A lot of leadership advice assumes stability, clear plans, steady execution, predictable inputs. But March has been a good reminder that the world doesnāt really care about our plans. So I want to put a simple question to the group: Is anti-fragility still necessary to be successful, or is it optional? If you think itās necessary, say why. If you think itās not, tell us what replaces it. 1. Where did volatility show up for you in the last 10 days, and did you get stronger, stay steady, or take a hit? 2. What part of your leadership or business is most fragile right now (the smallest disruption causes the biggest damage)? 3. Where are you playing it āsafeā but actually sitting in the dangerous middle, too much downside, not enough upside? 4. Whatās one thing you could remove this month that would make you more resilient immediately (a commitment, dependency, or complexity)?