I didn’t plan this video. No fancy edits. No script. But I had to hit record. There’s a new AI tech blowing up right now and unlike most hype cycles, this one is actually dangerous (in a good way) if you’re an online business owner. In the last 7 days, I’ve been using an open-source system that has quietly become: - My executive assistant - My developer - My designer - My project manager - My internal ops layer It texts me. Emails for me. Books meetings. Manages Slack. Tracks tasks. Builds apps. And gets better every single day. This is not another AI agent demo that skips the hard parts. In this video, I walk you through: - What this tech actually is (and what it replaces) - The exact setup I’m using - How I gave it its own email, calendar, iMessage, and Slack access - How to turn it into a real “employee,” not a toy - The security mistakes to avoid And lots more! If you’re busy, scaling, or drowning in admin work… This will feel like cheating. 👉 Watch the video now I’ve put together a full setup guide + checklist to avoid the common traps. Comment “Guide” and I’ll share it.

Cold email copy lives in a weird dilemma. You want: • opens • replies • booked calls But you also need to: • avoid spam • not sound salesy • not trip deliverability Most people overcomplicate this. After sending hundreds of thousands of cold emails, and helping 1,281+ people write cold email copy that actually gets replies, I simplified everything into a 3-step framework. Step 1: Bait the Open Before anyone reads your email… they decide whether to open it. That decision is driven by: • the subject line • the preview text (first sentence) Together, they must spark curiosity and stay relevant. They cannot sound promotional. The goal is simple: Make it feel like it could be from a colleague, client, or vendor. If it sounds like marketing → spam risk goes up. Step 2: Win the 3-Second Impression Once the email is opened, you have about 3 seconds. Your first 2–3 sentences should do three things: 1. Surface a real problem they recognize 2. Hint at a solution 3. Establish quiet credibility Not a pitch. Not a bio. Just enough context to make them think: “This might be relevant.” Miss this window, and the email is dead. Step 3: Get the “Yes” Cold email is not about closing. It’s about starting a conversation. The easiest way to do that? • Ask a clear, low-friction question • Make the reply effortless If they can respond with a simple “Yes”, you’ve done your job. Everything after that is sales. By the way, I’ve got something that makes this entire process much easier. Comment “Cold” and I’ll send it over.

Hey everyone 👋 I’d really appreciate some honest input from the community (and Jay if you see this). I’m currently testing two different offers and want to sanity-check which one is better to scale long-term in terms of: ease of selling predictability client retention stress / chaos and speed to cash Offer 1: LFS (Lead Follow-Up System) Automates SMS/email follow-up after inbound leads Focused on speed-to-lead, missed opportunities, show-up rates More ops / backend efficiency play Feels stickier once installed, but harder to explain + sell cold Offer 2: AI SMMA for Roofing (USA) Meta ads → AI caller (Synthflow) → booked inspections Selling booked appointments, not leads Very clear pain (“we want more inspections”) Easier to pitch, but more moving parts (ads, AI, expectations) My current thinking: LFS feels calmer + higher retention but harder to sell initially AI SMMA feels easier to sell + faster cash, but potentially more chaotic For those who’ve run agencies, SMMA, or ops-heavy offers: Which would YOU choose to scale right now and why? If your goal was predictable income (~$6k+), which path makes more sense? Any blind spots I’m missing on either model? Would really value different perspectives here 🙏 Thanks in advance. @Jay Feldman

Hey Jay — would really appreciate your eyes on this if you get a moment. I’m running cold outreach for a speed-to-lead & follow-up system sold to service-based businesses (coaches, consultants, professional services). I’m currently testing neutral/curious openers vs diagnostic openers, keeping everything else the same. 👉 My question: From a copy perspective (not structure), does this framing do a good enough job earning replies — or is there any obvious friction / over-explaining you’d trim? EMAIL COPY: Subject:Your leads are waiting 2+ hours, Jessica? Hello Jessica, Most {industry} businesses aren't challenged by lead volume — it’s what happens after a lead comes in that silently impacts revenue. Out of curiosity, how long does it typically take your team at {companyname} to follow up with an inquiry? (For most teams we speak with, it’s 2–6 hours without them realizing it.) If useful, I can put together a short 2-minute Lead Flow Risk Assessment for {companyname} . It's a quick Loom showing where lead momentum typically breaks after an inquiry. Worth me putiing this together for you? @Jay Feldman

Hey Jay — would really value your calibration on this. I’m currently running cold outreach for a speed-to-lead & follow-up system sold to service-based businesses (coaches / consultants / professional services). I’m not looking to change the offer — this is specifically about cold outreach structure in 2026 and whether my setup is good enough to close clients, or if I’m missing something obvious. Current outbound setup: - 4-step cold email sequence (short, professional, diagnostic) - Permission-based CTA (offer to send a short Loom audit) - 7-step warm nurture only after someone receives the Loom - Speed-to-lead replies under 5–10 minutes - Email + SMS show-up reminders for booked calls - No humor / no gimmicks / no aggressive guarantees - Early data is normal (some no’s, OOO, soft signals), but my main question is structural: 👉 In your view, is this sequence depth + structure enough in 2026 to reliably convert cold leads into calls — or do you see any red flags / unnecessary layers here? Not asking for copy critique — just whether the framework itself is solid or if you’d simplify further. Appreciate any insight. @Jay Feldman