Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
What is this?
Less
More

Memberships

PricingSaaS

1k members • Free

20 contributions to PricingSaaS
Monetizing MCP
Wanted to sanity check a view with you: MCP matters product-wise, but not as a standalone pricing unit. My take is SaaS companies shouldn’t monetize MCP itself. It’s a connectivity layer, and customers don’t buy “protocol access” - they buy the value it unlocks. So the monetization likely shows up in: - premium AI layers — paid add-ons / tiers with custom agents, integrations, context, admin controls, or workflow automation - usage-based pricing — credits, actions, outcomes - seat expansion / plan upgrades - pull-through to core product usage So my thesis is: don’t monetize the protocol; monetize the value created through it. Curious what others are seeing: - what usage patterns are real? - how are you packaging it? - what are customers actually paying for?
1 like • 9d
@Kareem El Muslemany a few months ago, MCP may have been a thing of discussion and probably still is for companies building connectivity offerings. I am not sure I see that for Zoom (unless I am missing something). If we go back to first principles and foundation of Zoom, the fact you could have people on a call with a simple thing was awesome. While minutes were the cost, the consumption was due to value of collaboration. International was premium connectivity and therefore monetizable (but expensive too). In AI, of MCP, where is connectivity in the value stack, and what are you trying to drive more off? Can I share a document with you specifically for Zoom? Email?
1 like • 9d
I wonder if your pricing strategy is not about customers of Zoom, but the ecosystem who wants to connect to Zoom. Hmm
Introducing Pulse Market Map 🗺️
We just shipped our first public PricingSaaS Skill. It's called Pulse Market Map Over the past couple weeks, hundreds of people have used the PricingSaaS MCP to do research, and one of the most common use cases is competitive intelligence. With Pulse Market Map, you can do competitive research that used to take hours (or days) in minutes. Here's how it works: ▶ PricingSaaS MCP is the intelligence layer — it connects your AI tool directly to the pricing data we're tracking across thousands of SaaS companies. ▶ Pulse Skills are the action layer -- they sit on top of the data and provide instructions for specific, executable workflows to make it immediately actionable. Pulse Market Map takes any SaaS category and generates a full competitive landscape report in minutes: → Every major player, segmented by tier → Pricing models and packaging details → Key patterns across the market → Strategic insights you can actually use You can install the Skill here: https://lnkd.in/ekbiep7J I also recorded a step-by-step tutorial to make setup easier. Would love to hear what you build with it — drop your results in the thread. And if anything feels off, please tell me. This is the first of many Skills and your feedback shapes what we build next 💪🏻
Introducing Pulse Market Map 🗺️
2 likes • 9d
Cool
Clay pricing changes.
https://www.clay.com/blog/introducing-clays-new-pricing
1 like • 15d
I think there is a lot to unpack here. @Rob Litterst @Kareem El Muslemany . Always good to see simplicity. Of course credit based is the “hot trend” and imho perhaps a clawback of bad usage based pricing implementations. Ultimately the best ones land in hybrid. Either by market forces or realization. Not saying it’s one or the other for clay. Also would be interesting to dive into the next phase of growth for them. Estimates are average $10k per customer revenue. Credit works in this range. Not sure about usage patterns. Suspecting less bursty traffic on average. Anyway some initial thoughts but all guesses for full disclosure
1 like • 11d
@Rob Litterst let me know when you are talking to Zona. Happy to join
The 2-3% of clients that are insufferable are starting to literally outweigh the 98-97% of normal ones.
The 2-3% of clients that are absolutely insufferable are starting to literally outweigh the 98-97% of normal ones. Running a B2B operation, you expect the occasional nightmare client. It comes with the territory. But lately the entitled, helpless, short-fused ones are showing up more frequently and more unhinged than ever. The demands are unreasonable, the goalposts never stop moving, and no matter what you deliver it's never enough. I used to brush it off. Now it's affecting the whole business. I don't want to shut down, but I'm running out of patience. I asked myself, could pricing solve this problem?
2 likes • 18d
@William Porter can you share more? Feel free to DM if you feel it’s not appropriate to openly vent. The reality is every person in this forum likely has the same problem whether they know it or not. It’s the nature of software. Pricing CAN be a lever but the better question to ask is to what extent. I have priced out customers, fired, or met demands through setting expectations and delivering. What’s your visibility in unit costs and adoption? How do your financial metrics look, with and without them? What do you loose (or gain) with more resources assigned to them.
Where does your product catalog live?
One of the hardest things to sort out in pricing seems to be wrangling the product catalog. Sales need it in CRM/CPQ systems. Finance need it in Billing/ERP systems. Product/Pricing need it in ... where? When products have usage-based pricing or entitlements, many ERPs can't handle it, and the product catalog spreads into a third system that handles usage, credits, entitlements, etc. We see how this crosses organization boundaries, lacking a single clear owner, and keeping everything in sync becomes super important - and very difficult to keep 100% correct over time. And most likely, someone in your organization is using Excel in some part of this process. Curious to hear how others split the product catalog, both horror stories and success stories.
1 like • 18d
@Jonas Wallenius it certainly depends. If your product has self service and is a modern SaaS architecture with dynamic infrastructure deployment, the source of truth starts or eventually is the product. The product feeds GLs where many have the source of truth for SKUs, which can be replicated in the billing system assuming you are using enterprise billing systems (think Zuora/Chargebee). However modern billing systems like metronome, Paid, or schematic solve specific problems well and their originate from these modern needs of Agent billing, usage based, entitlements, etc. One may argue that CRM/CPQ is the source of truth if heavy and pure sales led, long term contracts, etc. there is also a factor of operational maturity. Over time this all evolves and has to. Show me where you are and tell me where you are going and the answer will reveal itself. Often catalog or pricing is not the answer ( alone)
1-10 of 20
Akshay Patel
3
28points to level up
@akshay-patel-7567
SaaS and AI Guy in the cloud

Active 3d ago
Joined Nov 17, 2025
Powered by