I watched Iain Clifford's stream yesterday and for those combating Council Tax this might help. In short: The councils are renting out the courtrooms and playing court, I am sure most know this. It seems they may also be using council employees to act as the council solicitor/prosecutor, and these actors are not actually legally qualified, therefore making the whole case null and void. So if anyone is going to court soon for council tax, this may be a strategy to look at to get the case kicked out. Iain states that after several months of research, the only cases he can find where people have actually won in court have been through process challenges. It's all about the process with court, and this would be a break in process, therefore breaking their case. More info in the course coming soon. https://rosmediaplatform.com/video/413/beat-council-tax-the-structural-solution-explainer-video/

So could it be assumed or presumed then, by acquiescing to mail fraud we are unwittingly recognising legal system jurisdiction and therefore expected to settle any claims made against living men and women by dead entities called corporations that only exist on paper? Why should anyone forego their rights by accepting an invitation from an administrative court to 'appear', like a ghost, upon receipt of a 'summons', merely for not having declined and returned any incorrectly delivered offers to contract mailed to non-existent fictional addressees in a language that is not English, possibly resulting in fines and forfeitures if consent and signature are not withheld, in breach of the English Bill of Rights 1688 and without a trial by jury? From personal experience declining offers to contract will invoke unlawful harassment by third parties enlisted by agents of a body corporate to coerce settlement using menace and threatened or actual theft of property. Harassment by third parties not having privity of contract, that assume the right to trespass and without any lawful documentation, knowledge of the law, proof of contractual obligation or proof of having obtained the written informed consent of the private property owner to comply with the rules and policies the third party interloper claims to derive authority from? Merely for declining to enter into contract with agents sending incessant postal articles making false claims that are not true bills or invoices and without our being obligated under mutually agreed and signed contract? It does seem that some postal invitations to appear in court may not even have originated from a court of record but by agents falsely pretending to act under the authority of a court, seemingly with little or no regard to corporate policy, rules, regulations or Acts of Parliament that they have a duty to comply with and seemingly without consequence or arrest? If this is not at the very least fraud and racketeering, then what is it?

Can a "Bill of Exchange" be used in the UK to pay for a utility bill. Or would this be double dipping on the side of the utility corporations!

Need Help on my council tax battle - Liability Order

Hi there - not sure if this is the right forum, but I have just buy a second property and keep getting hounded by the council re council tax.. with letters to the new owner etc. They even sent a man around with who left a personal note. I am keeping all corres and would love to write to them with no name on the letter, asking them to stop contacting me... can I do this and what can they do in return. If they dont know my name they cant detail it on any request for payment right - also, if they do, they they are breaking GDPR rules etc... anyone have any bright ideas or tip d' jours? Thank you in advance. Andrew