2d • General discussion
Surreal
So could it be assumed or presumed then, by acquiescing to mail fraud we are unwittingly recognising legal system jurisdiction and therefore expected to settle any claims made against living men and women by dead entities called corporations that only exist on paper?
Why should anyone forego their rights by accepting an invitation from an administrative court to 'appear', like a ghost, upon receipt of a 'summons', merely for not having declined and returned any incorrectly delivered offers to contract mailed to non-existent fictional addressees in a language that is not English, possibly resulting in fines and forfeitures if consent and signature are not withheld, in breach of the English Bill of Rights 1688 and without a trial by jury?
From personal experience declining offers to contract will invoke unlawful harassment by third parties enlisted by agents of a body corporate to coerce settlement using menace and threatened or actual theft of property. Harassment by third parties not having privity of contract, that assume the right to trespass and without any lawful documentation, knowledge of the law, proof of contractual obligation or proof of having obtained the written informed consent of the private property owner to comply with the rules and policies the third party interloper claims to derive authority from? Merely for declining to enter into contract with agents sending incessant postal articles making false claims that are not true bills or invoices and without our being obligated under mutually agreed and signed contract?
It does seem that some postal invitations to appear in court may not even have originated from a court of record but by agents falsely pretending to act under the authority of a court, seemingly with little or no regard to corporate policy, rules, regulations or Acts of Parliament that they have a duty to comply with and seemingly without consequence or arrest?
If this is not at the very least fraud and racketeering, then what is it?
Could any that consider getting entangled with the legal system reasonably expect to prevail, without possibly incurring great cost on top of administrative court fees for the privege of bringing a case, without years of training and experience, in a deliberately complex system stacked with word magic traps to avoid and which rely on having consented to be re-presented as a make-believe dead entity to facilitate the admininistation of a constructive trust in something that only resembles the name of a man or woman?
Why are we expected to discharge debts to administrative courts, perhaps legalists too or those labeling themselves as lawyers, for opting to use this system to defend ourselves from false commercial claims originating from other corporate bodies acting under the same jurisdiction? Do not such claims apply only to other corporations, not to living beings, for so-called offences or violations that do not involve causing harm or loss to another and therefore is not a crime?
Until such time that all comply with common and constitutional law how will it ever be possible to obtain justice and remedy for crimes against men and women unless under common law jurisdiction?
Does anyone know where common law cases may be routinely conducted and how to find helpful information, perhaps even how to draw on the knowledge and experience of others experienced in common law cases?
Finally is it possible that at this momemt America is exiting the Admiralty Law system and activating a new land based system, to become a fully restored constitutional republic, as the following link posts 1 to 7 describe? Is it possible that law and order will be fully restored and how will this echo around the world?
0
0 comments
Surreal
powered by
skool.com/not-a-person-3150
Just for fun and Education, the wonderful world of Law and legal, with video discussions and chat and motivation.
Suggested communities
Powered by