Beyond the Ribbon - Symbolism & Commercialism in Women’s Health

Beyond the Ribbon - Symbolism & Commercialism in Women’s Health - Part 2

Here’s the full story of Charlotte Haley and the origin of the peach ribbon that eventually led to the now -ubiquitous pink ribbon for breast cancer awareness - including both the inspiring parts and the complex bits you may want to reflect on.

The Origins - A Grass-roots Call to Action

In 1991, Charlotte Haley — then about 68 years old, and someone whose grandmother, sister and daughter had battled breast cancer — began making peach-coloured ribbons at home in Simi Valley, California.

She attached to each packet of five ribbons a postcard that read -

“The National Cancer Institute’s annual budget is $1.8 billion, only 5 percent goes for cancer prevention. Help us wake up legislators and America by wearing this ribbon.”

Her goal was fundamentally prevention-oriented: to draw attention not merely to breast cancer itself but to how little funding was being devoted to preventing it.

She distributed the ribbons in her local supermarket, wrote letters to prominent women (including past First Ladies), and spread the word via grassroots channels.

Shift to the Pink Ribbon - Commercialization & Scaling

In 1992, SELF magazine (editor Alexandra Penney) and Estée Lauder Companies (with senior VP Evelyn Lauder) were preparing a national breast cancer awareness issue and approached Haley about using her ribbon and message.

Haley declined because she felt the campaign would become too commercial.

The magazine and company then simply changed the color from peach to pink — meaning they did not need her permission to use the symbol.

In October 1992 the pink ribbon was distributed at Estée Lauder cosmetics counters nationwide, tied into the October Breast Cancer Awareness month campaign.

Why This Matters - From Symbol to Movement

The peach ribbon was the first known ribbon campaign for breast cancer awareness, created by a lay advocate rather than a major brand or organization.

Some advocates argue the original message (prevention, funding allocation, systemic change) was diluted when the symbol became mass-marketed.

The term “pinkwashing” is used to critique how some companies use the pink ribbon (or pink-themed products) primarily as marketing - sometimes even on products that may contain carcinogens.

The pink ribbon is a symbol of hope - but the deeper work is in prevention, detoxification, hormonal awareness, environmental reduction (which aligns with your modules on xeno-estrogens and hormone health).

Go beyond “wearing the ribbon” and ask- What does my body need? What changes can I make? The ribbon is a useful prompt, but the action is the real work.

Be aware of the commercialization - When You see "pink" everywhere in October (products, promotions), ask - Is the product supporting real research/prevention? Does it align with my health values?

https://wiki.ubc.ca/Commercialization_of_Breast_Cancer

I don't want to pick on any companies, beauty care or food products that contain cancer causing ingredients.

The intention is to bring LIGHT and awareness to the conversation, not darkness.

Where we put our Consumer dollars drives change.

8 comments