๐Ÿง  The Bittensor Alpha Play: Mining Human Attention Instead of Compute
TL;DR: While everyone's chasing GPU mining ๐Ÿ”ฅ, there's a quieter opportunity in Bittensor's creator economy subnets that rewards you for verifying human engagement rather than burning electricity โšก.
The halving is in ~48 hours (Dec 12-14) โฐ, and positioning now could be critical.
๐Ÿ’Ž What Makes This Different?
Bittensor (TAO) isn't just another blockchainโ€”it's a decentralized marketplace for any digital commodity ๐ŸŒ. While most subnets reward computational work (like training AI models ๐Ÿค–), three subnets have emerged with a unique thesis:
The blockchain can verify human attention and creativity better than centralized platforms ๐ŸŽฏ.
This matters because:
  • The Creator Economy is worth $250B+ ๐Ÿ’ฐ but controlled by centralized gatekeepers ๐Ÿฐ
  • AI companies are desperate for verified, human-generated training data ๐Ÿ“Š
  • Ad fraud costs billions ๐Ÿšจโ€”proving real human views is extremely valuable โœ…
The Three Business Models
๐ŸŽฅ SN93 (Bitcast) - The Agency Model
What it verifies: Human attention on sponsored content
How it works:
  • Advertisers post "Briefs" (campaign requirements)
  • Miners coordinate with YouTube creators to produce matching content
  • Validators verify engagement using OAuth-gated YouTube Analytics API
  • Key metric: estimatedRedPartnerRevenue (only paid by real, verified humans)
The Alpha: Run it as an agencyโ€”manage up to 5 YouTube channels under one miner UID. You pay creators $500-1000 per video, but capture the TAO emissions yourself.
Economics (Post-Halving):
  • Monthly OpEx: ~$5,000 (creator payouts)
  • Monthly Revenue: ~$27,000 (90 TAO @ $300)
  • Net Profit: $21,000/month
Why it's attractive: Low hardware requirements (just a VPS), high operational leverage through human capital.
๐Ÿ–ฅ๏ธ SN24 (Omega Labs) - The Broker Model
What it verifies: Human productivity and task completion
How it works:
  • Users run the "Focus" desktop app that records screen activity (coding, design, etc.)
  • Miners act as data brokers, purchasing and submitting this data
  • Validators score based on relevance, novelty, and richness using AI models
  • The dataset becomes training material for next-gen AI
Economics:
  • Monthly OpEx: ~$2,000 (data purchasing)
  • Monthly Revenue: ~$22,500 (75 TAO)
  • Net Profit: $12,500/month
The catch: Requires significant GPU compute (RTX 3090/4090 with 24GB+ VRAM) for validation.
๐Ÿค– SN13 (Data Universe) - The Scraper Model
What it verifies: Data recency and freshness
How it works:
  • Automated scraping bots crawl Twitter, Reddit, YouTube for fresh data
  • "Desirability Index" tells you what's most valuable to scrape right now
  • High-volume, commodity-style operation
Economics:
  • Monthly OpEx: ~$3,000 (residential proxies to avoid bans)
  • Monthly Revenue: ~$18,000 (60 TAO)
  • Net Profit: $13,000/month
The grind: This is a "proxy war"โ€”you're constantly fighting platform rate limits.
โšก The Halving Catalyst (Dec 12-14) ๐Ÿ“…
Bittensor's first halving cuts daily emissions from 7,200 TAO to 3,600 TAO โœ‚๏ธ.
What this means:
  • Supply shock similar to Bitcoin halvings ๐Ÿ“‰
  • Miner sell pressure drops 50% ๐ŸŽฏ
  • Price needs to double to maintain miner profitability ๐Ÿ’น
  • Marginal miners with high OpEx will capitulate ๐Ÿšช
  • Agencies with multiple revenue streams survive better ๐Ÿ›ก๏ธ
Historical pattern: Bitcoin halvings preceded major bull runs ๐Ÿš€ due to reduced sell pressure.
๐Ÿ”„ Dynamic TAO (dTAO): The Game-Changer ๐ŸŽฎ
The new "flow-based" emissions system is huge for creator subnets:
Old system: 64 oligarchs (Root Validators) decided which subnets get emissions ๐Ÿ‘‘
New system: Emissions follow TAO staking inflows ๐Ÿ’ง
  • Users stake TAO into subnet pools ๐ŸŠ
  • Each subnet has its own "Alpha" token that trades against TAO ๐Ÿช™
  • Net inflow = more emissions ๐Ÿ“Š
Why this favors SN93: A YouTuber with 1M subscribers can tell their audience "Stake TAO to support my content" ๐Ÿ“ฃ. This creates a direct marketing channel that technical subnets don't have.
The Flywheel: ๐Ÿ” Quality Content โ†’ Attention โ†’ TAO/Alpha Purchases โ†’ Higher Emissions โ†’ Better Creator Payouts โ†’ Better Content
๐Ÿ’ฐ The Entry Barriers (Do Your Homework) ๐Ÿ“š
Registration Burn Cost: ๐Ÿ”ฅ
  • Dynamic pricing based on demand ๐Ÿ“ˆ
  • Can range from 0.1 TAO to 100+ TAO ๐Ÿ’ธ
  • Check live cost: btcli subnet register --netuid 93 --preview
  • This cost is burned (lost forever) โšฐ๏ธ if you get deregistered for poor performance
Immunity Period: โณ
  • ~13 hours grace period after registration (4,096 blocks) โฐ
  • Must be fully operational before immunity expires โš ๏ธ
  • If you score 0 after immunity ends, you can be kicked out ๐Ÿšช
The Agency Advantage: Spreading risk across 5 channels means one zero doesn't kill you ๐Ÿ›ก๏ธ.
๐ŸŽฏ Strategic Recommendations ๐Ÿ“Š
For Investors: ๐Ÿ’ผ
  • Accumulate TAO before halving (supply shock incoming) ๐Ÿ”ฅ
  • Consider Alpha tokens, especially ฮฑโ‚‰โ‚ƒ (Bitcast has clearest revenue model) ๐Ÿ’Ž
  • Stake TAO to high-performance subnets via dTAO for yield ๐Ÿ“ˆ
For Operators: ๐Ÿ› ๏ธ
  • SN93 Agency Model = Best risk-adjusted return โœ… for non-technical operators
  • Requires deal-making skills ๐Ÿค and content strategy ๐Ÿ“, not GPUs
  • Break-even in ~1 month ๐Ÿ“… vs. traditional GPU mining's longer timelines
For Everyone: ๐Ÿ‘ฅ
  • This isn't "passive income" โŒโ€”it's active relationship management ๐Ÿค
  • Platform risk is real ๐Ÿšจ (Google could change APIs overnight)
  • Regulatory risk exists โš–๏ธ (especially for data scraping)
โš ๏ธ Key Risks ๐Ÿšจ
  1. Platform Dependency: Google controls the APIs SN93 relies on ๐Ÿ”Œ
  2. Volatility: If TAO price drops 50%, high-OpEx models become unprofitable ๐Ÿ“‰
  3. Compliance: GDPR/CCPA concerns for data collection subnets โš–๏ธ
  4. Technical Complexity: OAuth, API management, multi-channel coordination ๐Ÿ”ง
๐Ÿš€ The Thesis ๐Ÿ’ก
We're witnessing a shift from "Proof of Work" โš’๏ธ to "Proof of Value" ๐Ÿ’Ž.
Instead of proving you burned electricity โšก, you're proving:
  • Real humans watched content ๐Ÿ‘€ (SN93)
  • Real humans performed valuable tasks ๐Ÿ’ผ (SN24)
  • Real data exists right now โฐ (SN13)
The winners won't be those with the most hashpower ๐Ÿ–ฅ๏ธ, but those who can most effectively bridge the blockchain with messy, valuable human reality ๐ŸŒ.
๐Ÿ’ฌ Discussion Questions ๐Ÿค”
  1. Would you rather manage creator relationships ๐Ÿค (SN93) or run scraping infrastructure โš™๏ธ (SN13)?
  2. How do you think the halving will impact TAO price over the next 6 months? ๐Ÿ“ˆ๐Ÿ“‰
  3. What happens to these subnets if YouTube or Google changes their API policies? ๐Ÿ”„
  4. Is the "Agency Model" sustainable long-term, or will creators eventually cut out the middleman? ๐Ÿคท
Drop your thoughts below ๐Ÿ‘‡. The halving is imminent โฐโ€”this is a positioning moment ๐ŸŽฏ.
Disclaimer: This is educational analysis, not financial advice. Bittensor mining involves significant capital risk. DYOR. โš ๏ธ
7:24
1
0 comments
David Zimmerman
6
๐Ÿง  The Bittensor Alpha Play: Mining Human Attention Instead of Compute
DeFi University
skool.com/defiuniversity
Master DeFi from beginner to advanced. Security-first curriculum, live mentorship, gamified learning. Join us and build DeFi expertise safely.
Leaderboard (30-day)
Powered by