Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
What is this?
Less
More

Memberships

DeFi University

159 members โ€ข $97/m

8 contributions to DeFi University
Keep you eye on Japan
https://x.com/KobeissiLetter/status/1996196121941856572?s=20
3
0
๐Ÿšจ The $1.4T "Air Pocket" in the Treasury Market (And Why 2026 is the Danger Zone)
TL;DR: The SEC just finalized the deadline that effectively kills the biggest trade in the world. While the official date is June 2027, the "pre-compliance" unwind likely starts in mid-2026. If you aren't watching the repo market plumbing, you're flying blind. 1. The "Three-Body Problem" ๐ŸŒ For decades, the US Treasury market was stable because it stood on two "anchor" legs: 1. The Fed: Bought debt for policy (QE). 2. Foreign Central Banks: Bought debt for trade reserves. The Problem: Both anchors have left the building. The Fed is shedding assets (QT), and foreign demand has dried up. So who is buying the trillions in new US debt? Enter the "Third Body": The Cayman Whale ๐Ÿณ A massive $1.4 trillion "shadow inventory" of US debt is now held by offshore hedge funds. Unlike the old anchors, they are not long-term investors. They are "renters" looking for a quick arbitrage profit called the Basis Trade. 2. The Machine: Infinite Leverage โš™๏ธ The "Whale" doesn't use its own money. It uses a loophole in the plumbing to get 50x to 100x leverage. - Step 1: Buy the cheap cash bond. - Step 2: Sell the expensive futures contract. - Step 3 (The Key): Finance the bond in the bilateral Repo market with 0% haircuts (zero money down). This entire $1.4T structure rests on that "0% down" financing. And that is exactly what the government is about to ban. 3. The Catalyst: The SEC Mandate (Updated Timeline) ๐Ÿ“… The SEC has confirmed the deadline to force these repo trades into a Central Clearinghouse. - The Date: The hammer drops on June 30, 2027 for repo transactions. - The Impact: Central clearing bans "zero haircut" deals. It mandates ~2% margin. - The Result: Going from 0% down to 2% down destroys the trade's math. The "Whale" will be forced to exit because the trade is no longer profitable. 4. The Danger Zone: The "Liquidity Air Pocket" ๐Ÿ“‰ Here is the critical part: Markets don't wait for deadlines. Smart money will "pre-comply" to beat the rush. We expect the unwind to begin around mid-2026 (12 months before the deadline).
2 likes โ€ข 8d
the action on BTC today gives us the answer. if your analysis is correct i believe they started last night(injected 13.5 billions ) BTC is the only pure Bellwether that can detect LIQUIDITY in the system
Keep your eye on Japan
According to The Japan Times, Japanโ€™s two-year government bond yield rose to 1%, the highest since 2008, signaling market expectations that the Bank of Japan (BOJ) is nearing a rate hike. The five-year and ten-year yields climbed to 1.35% and 1.845%, respectively, while the yen strengthened 0.4% to 155.49 against the dollar. Markets now price in a 76% probability of a BOJ rate hike at its December 19 meeting, rising to over 90% for January.
Market reversal from the a severe sell off
the probability of interest rate cut in December by 1/4 up sharply this morning at 62% from 33% on John William comment for a possible cut in december.
The Hidden Costs of Providing Liquidity in Volatile Altcoin Markets ๐Ÿ’ธ
Hey DeFi University community! ๐Ÿ‘‹ I want to break down something critical that's eating into LP profits across the DeFi ecosystem - especially if you're providing liquidity for volatile altcoins. This might explain why your LP positions aren't performing as well as you expected. The Big Picture Problem ๐ŸŽฏ When Uniswap v3 launched concentrated liquidity, it promised up to 4,000x capital efficiency. Sounds amazing, right? But here's what they don't advertise: in volatile altcoin markets, you're often better off just holding the tokens. Let me explain why. Three Hidden Costs Destroying LP Returns ๐Ÿ“‰ 1. Leveraged Divergence Loss โšก Remember impermanent loss from v2? Well, concentrated liquidity doesn't eliminate it - it amplifies it. - Wide range (like 2x price movement): You might experience 4x the impermanent loss of a full-range position - The tighter your range, the worse it gets - Example: PEPE/WETH pools in Q1 2023 saw -4.2% divergence loss even with +3.1% fees earned 2. LVR (Loss-Versus-Rebalancing) ๐Ÿ”„ This is the silent killer most LPs don't even know about. Every time the market price moves, arbitrage bots extract value from your position before you can react. Here's the brutal math: - LVR scales with volatility squared - if volatility doubles, your LVR quadruples - PEPE/WETH (250% annualized volatility): -35% LVR vs +20% fees = -15% net return ๐Ÿšจ - Even "safer" pairs like ARB/WETH are underwater after LVR 3. MEV Extraction ๐Ÿค– Every time you rebalance your position, you're vulnerable to: - Sandwich attacks (bots front-run and back-run your trades) - JIT liquidity diluting your fee share - On Base L2, over 50% of gas is used for MEV extraction! The Chain Architecture Problem โ›“๏ธ Ethereum L1: Fewer but bigger MEV hits. Your rebalances get sandwiched hard. ๐Ÿฅช L2s (Arbitrum/Base): Death by a thousand cuts. Lower gas means constant arbitrage bleeding your position. ๐Ÿ’‰ So What Actually Works? ๐Ÿ› ๏ธ For Individual LPs: 1. Choose your battles: Avoid ultra-volatile pairs unless fees are genuinely massive 2. Go wider or use ALMs: Narrow ranges in volatile markets = guaranteed losses 3. Use MEV protection: Submit rebalances through Flashbots Protect or similar services ๐Ÿ›ก๏ธ 4. Consider alternative DEXs: Curve v2 and Balancer have built-in protections
0 likes โ€ข Nov 3
A bearish divergence has formed on the Nasdaq index (daily frame) a correction is imminent or at least a sideway action with bearish bias
0 likes โ€ข Nov 3
BTC the bearish divergence is on the weekly frame and has been playing out for the last six weeks
1-8 of 8
Ramzy Kassouf
2
8points to level up
@jason-serfaty-4516
Former Institutional Equity Trader and Organic Farm entrepreneur / speaker.

Active 29m ago
Joined Jul 17, 2025
Powered by