🏛️ Euler Finance: From $197M Hack to DeFi's Most Battle-Tested Protocol

GM DeFi community! ☀️

Buckle up for one of the wildest redemption arcs in crypto history. We're talking about Euler Finance—a protocol that went from getting absolutely rekt to becoming arguably the most sophisticated lending platform in DeFi. This is a story of innovation, catastrophic failure, and an 18-month resurrection that changed everything. 🔥

📚 The Three Acts of Euler

Act 1: Euler v1 - The Innovator (2021-2023) Permissionless lending with Uniswap v3 TWAP oracles for long-tail assets. Cool idea, but...

Act 2: The $197 Million Nightmare (March 2023) One of the largest DeFi hacks in history. Absolute chaos. 💀

Act 3: The Rebirth - Euler v2 (September 2024) A complete architectural reimagining that makes the protocol basically unhackable. More on this in a minute.

💥 Let's Talk About THAT Hack

March 13, 2023: The Day Everything Went Wrong

Euler v1 had a fatal flaw. The entire protocol was built like a monolith—one giant shared pool where all assets lived together. Think of it like one massive vault where everyone's assets are mixed together. If ONE thing breaks? The whole system can collapse.

Here's How It Went Down:

The attacker found a bug in the donateToReserves function. Ironically, this function was added to FIX a previous security issue (the "First Deposit Bug" discovered by whitehat Kankodu). Security fixes creating new vulnerabilities? Classic crypto moment. 😅

The Exploit Mechanics (Simplified):

Leverage Loop: Attacker flash-borrowed $30M DAI, deposited it, then recursively borrowed against it to create a 10x leveraged position. Think of it like using credit card A to pay credit card B to pay credit card C... except with millions of dollars.
Artificial Insolvency: Called donateToReserves which BURNED their collateral (eDAI) but didn't check if they still had debt. Suddenly their account looked massively underwater—way more debt than collateral.
The Self-Liquidation Trick: Used a second address to liquidate their own insolvent position. Because the account looked SO underwater, the liquidation discount mechanism glitched out. The attacker got to claim the protocol's assets at a massive discount.

Final Damage: $197 million drained. The protocol was bleeding out. ⚰️

🕵️ The Recovery: One of the Craziest Chapters in DeFi History

Here's where it gets WILD.

Enter "Jacob"

The hacker started communicating on-chain, calling themselves "Jacob." Under massive pressure from:

Chainalysis tracking every movement
Coinbase Unit 0x (their forensics team)
The very real possibility of getting doxxed due to OpSec failures

Jacob started negotiating.

The North Korean Psyop 🎭

In a galaxy-brain move, Jacob sent 100 ETH to a wallet linked to the Lazarus Group (North Korea's state-sponsored hacking group). This was likely "flag planting"—trying to make law enforcement think this was a nation-state attack so they'd back off.

It didn't work.

The Resolution:

By April 4, 2023, Euler announced the impossible: near-total recovery of funds.

$177 million returned (the largest DeFi hack recovery in history)
Jacob kept ~$19 million (10%) as a "bug bounty"
Euler agreed to drop legal pursuit

This wasn't just luck. This was forensic pressure, on-chain negotiation, and the reality that moving $197M in stolen crypto without getting caught is basically impossible in 2023.

🏗️ Euler v2: The Complete Architectural Overhaul

After 18 months of rebuilding, Euler launched v2 in September 2024. They didn't just patch the bug. They burned it all down and rebuilt from scratch with a completely different philosophy.

The Old Way vs. The New Way

Euler v1: One big pool. All assets together. Shared risk. One vulnerability = everything at risk.

Euler v2: Modular vault ecosystem. Every vault is isolated. A problem in one vault CANNOT spread to others.

It's like moving from one giant shared apartment building to a complex of individual houses with walls between them. 🏘️

🔧 The Two Core Primitives

1. Euler Vault Kit (EVK) - The Building Blocks

This is a smart contract factory that lets anyone create ERC-4626 compliant vaults with borrowing logic baked in.

The Dual-Token System:

sTokens: Your shares/assets in the vault
DTokens (Debt Tokens): Your liabilities/borrowing

DTokens are NON-TRANSFERABLE. Why? To prevent "debt shifting exit scams" where someone borrows against their collateral then transfers the debt to a different account before running away with the collateral. Can't game the system if you can't transfer your debt. 🔒

Nested Vaults: Get this—you can take sTokens from one vault and use them as collateral in another vault. This enables:

Native recursive leverage
"Fund of funds" structures
Complex multi-layered strategies

2. Ethereum Vault Connector (EVC) - The Glue

This is the immutable "hyperstructure" that connects all the vaults together safely.

Sub-Accounts: 256 Strategies, One Wallet 🎯

Every Ethereum address gets 256 virtual sub-accounts (derived via bitwise XOR magic on the last byte of your address). This means you can run:

A degen 10x leverage play on sub-account 1
A safe blue-chip position on sub-account 2
An experimental meme-coin strategy on sub-account 3

All from ONE wallet. And they're completely isolated from each other.

Deferred Liquidity Checks:

This is genius. You can batch together complex operations (swaps, withdrawals, borrows, deposits) and the system only checks your solvency at the END of the entire batch.

Benefits:

Way less gas (not checking after every single operation)
More complex strategies possible
Better capital efficiency

Flash Liquidity:

The EVC facilitates flash loans across ANY connected vault without needing a central aggregator. Need quick liquidity for an arb? The system's got you covered.

🗂️ Vault Classes: Risk Segmentation

Euler v2 has three types of vaults, each with different risk profiles:

Core Vaults 💎

Blue-chip assets: USDC, WETH, WBTC
Managed by high-reputation curators
Cross-collateralization allowed
Think of these as the "safe" vaults

Edge Vaults ⚡

Long-tail assets: meme-coins, L2 tokens, experimental stuff
ISOLATED risk
Bad debt in an Edge vault CANNOT spread to Core vaults
This is where you go full degen

Escrow Vaults 🏦

Collateral storage WITHOUT rehypothecation
Your assets just sit there, they don't get lent out
Perfect for non-yielding assets or governance tokens
Maximum security, zero yield risk

🏢 The Institutional Play: Private Credit on Public Rails

Here's where Euler v2 gets REALLY interesting for institutions. It's not just a lending protocol—it's "banking software" that happens to run on Ethereum.

The Hook System: Programmable Vault Logic

Vault governors can inject custom code that runs BEFORE standard operations. This is done through a "bitfield" system where you pick exactly which operations to hook:

OP_DEPOSIT
OP_BORROW
OP_TRANSFER
And more...

Why This Matters for Private Credit:

Let's say you're running a permissioned vault for accredited investors only. You can:

Hook OP_DEPOSIT to verify KYC/whitelist before allowing deposits
Hook OP_TRANSFER to prevent whitelisted users from selling shares to non-whitelisted addresses
Hook OP_BORROW to enforce custom credit limits

The Trailing Calldata Security Feature:

To prevent spoofing, when a vault calls a hook, it appends 20 bytes of the authenticated user's address to the end of the calldata. This makes it cryptographically impossible for someone to fake being an approved user.

Real-World Assets (RWAs) and Oracle Chaining

Private credit vaults often deal with illiquid RWAs. The EulerRouter handles this through:

Oracle Chaining: Need to price an exotic asset? Chain multiple price feeds together: TRE/ETH × ETH/USD = TRE/USD

Conservative Spreads: Oracles return TWO prices: Bid (exit) and Ask (entry)

Your collateral is valued at the LOWER Bid price
Your liabilities are valued at the HIGHER Ask price
This creates a safety buffer

💰 The Economics: EUL Token and Revenue Model

The EUL token is capped at 27,182,818 tokens (yes, that's a mathematical constant reference 🤓).

From "Valueless Governance Token" to Cash-Flow Machine

Euler v2 fixed the tokenomics problem that plagues most DeFi protocols.

The Fee Flow Module:

Instead of distributing tiny amounts of random tokens to EUL holders (basically worthless "dust"), here's what happens:

Protocol fees accumulate in various assets (USDC, WETH, etc.)
These get auctioned via Reverse Dutch Auctions
Bidders use EUL to purchase these assets
The EUL flows to the DAO treasury
DAO can burn it or redistribute it

RewardStreams:

External protocols can incentivize specific Euler vaults with their own tokens to bootstrap liquidity. Think Curve gauge wars but for lending.

Key Governance Milestones

eIP 55: Authorized emergency negotiations with the hacker (the one that led to the $177M recovery)
eIP 62: Allocated $1.25M for the v2 audit competition
EIP 65 (2025): Activated a 10% protocol fee on interest for major markets (USDC, WETH)

That last one is HUGE. It marks the transition from "protocol that doesn't make money" to "protocol generating real revenue." 📈

🛡️ Security: Defense in Depth

After getting hacked for $197M, Euler became OBSESSED with security. They spent over $4 million on security reviews.

The Security Arsenal:

31 Separate Audits 🔍 Including audits from:

OpenZeppelin
Trail of Bits
OtterSec
And 28 more firms

Formal Verification (FV):

They hired Certora to MATHEMATICALLY PROVE the correctness of core invariants. Not just "we tested it," but "we can prove with math that users cannot withdraw more than their balance."

$1.25 Million Public Bug Bounty Contest:

Hosted on Cantina. Open to any security researcher. If you can break it, you get paid.

Risk Curators Instead of DAO Committees:

Rather than having a centralized DAO committee set risk parameters, Euler v2 has a MARKETPLACE of professional risk curators:

Gauntlet
Sentora
Re7 Labs

These firms manage specific vaults and face REAL reputational and financial consequences if their vaults accrue bad debt. Incentives are aligned. 🎯

📊 Market Position: The Underdog with Superior Metrics

As of late 2025, here's where Euler stands compared to the giants:

Aave v3:

TVL: ~$30.7 Billion
Active Loans: ~$16.5 Billion
Utilization: ~50-60%
Philosophy: Brand trust and safety first

Morpho:

TVL: ~$5.8 Billion
Active Loans: ~$3.9 Billion
Utilization: ~85-90%
Philosophy: Minimal gas, P2P efficiency

Euler v2:

TVL: ~$978 Million
Active Loans: ~$1.28 Billion (wait, what? 👀)
Utilization: ~80-85%
Philosophy: Customizability and leverage

The Mind-Bending Math

Notice anything weird? Euler has $1.28B in active loans on only $978M TVL.

That's a loan-to-TVL ratio of 131%. How is that even possible?

Answer: Recursive Borrowing and Looping 🌀

Sophisticated actors are using nested vaults to create leveraged positions. They:

Deposit USDC
Borrow ETH against it
Deposit that ETH into another vault
Borrow more USDC
Repeat

Each loop increases the "active loans" metric without requiring new TVL. This is capital efficiency on steroids.

The Risk Premium Reality

Euler v2 typically offers 50-100 basis points higher yields than Aave.

Why? Two factors:

Memory of the 2023 hack: Market assigns a "risk premium" because of the exploit history
High utilization rates: Active Risk Curators maintain 80-85%+ utilization, which drives yields up

For savvy DeFi users, this creates alpha opportunities. You're getting paid MORE for using a protocol that's arguably MORE secure (after spending $4M on security) than its competitors.

🎯 The Bottom Line

Euler Finance went through hell and came out the other side with:

✅ The largest DeFi hack recovery in history ($177M returned)

✅ A complete architectural redesign that isolates risk at the vault level

✅ Institutional-grade infrastructure for private credit and RWAs

✅ A sustainable revenue model (10% protocol fees)

✅ Over $4M invested in security audits and formal verification

✅ Capital efficiency metrics that surpass protocols 30x their size

The Philosophy Shift:

Euler v2 isn't trying to be "DeFi Lending Protocol #1 by TVL." It's positioning itself as the infrastructure layer for credit markets—public and private, permissionless and permissioned, vanilla and exotic.

It's less "bank" and more "banking software."

And for those of us building in DeFi or allocating capital professionally, that matters a hell of a lot more than raw TVL numbers. 💪

🤔 Discussion Questions

Would you trust a protocol that got hacked for $197M but recovered it all?
Are isolated vault architectures the future of DeFi lending, or is there value in unified pools?
Is the 50-100 bps yield premium worth the perceived "hack history" risk?
What other use cases could the EVC's 256 sub-accounts enable?

Drop your thoughts below! Let's talk about the future of lending. 👇

Not financial advice. The 2023 hack happened. Do your own research. Understand the risks. But also understand the recovery and rebuilding effort that followed. 🙏

9:59

0 comments