User
Write something
🔒 Q&A w/ Nate is happening in 15 hours
Pinned
🚀New Video: I Turned Claude Opus 4.8 Into My Entire AI Operating System
In this video I show you how I turned Claude Opus 4.8 into my full AI operating system that runs my businesses, holds all my context, and replaces the constant tab switching between apps. I walk through the Four C's I use to build it (context, connections, capabilities, cadence), the mindset shift of working out of Claude Code by default, how I organize files and skills, and the bike method for safely giving agents more autonomy. By the end you'll know exactly how to set up your own AI OS and the trap to avoid when you start handing it real keys. GITHUB REPO
Pinned
"AI consultant" is one of the hottest titles in business right now.
But it also has an expiration date. Right now, sticking "AI" in front of "consultant" is a real edge. The search demand is there. The budgets are there. Companies are actively hunting for someone who can walk in, look at their operations, and tell them what to actually do with this stuff. So if you're trying to position yourself, take the label. It works. But the label is the temporary part and we've seen this cycle before. → When Excel showed up, people might've called themselves "Excel accountants." But how ridiculous would it be if someone introduced themselves like that today? → When the internet showed up, people spun up "internet marketing" agencies. Now that's just marketing. AI is doing the same thing to consulting because AI is going to seep into everything. In a few years, the qualifier drops. The consultants who aren't AI native won't be winning business. They'll just be bad consultants. The job under the hood doesn't change. A consultant walks into a business, finds the actual constraint, and prescribes a solution. The newest tech is the toolbox, not the job description. But people take the "AI consultant" title and assume the answer always has to be AI. Sometimes the right call is a database restructure. Sometimes it's a better SaaS tool. Sometimes it's a deterministic workflow with zero AI in it. I'm not saying AI is never the answer. It's the highest-impact tool we've had in a long time. But forcing it where it doesn't belong is how clients lose trust fast. I think about it as a pyramid. → Bottom: deterministic workflows. No AI. Cheap, fast, reliable. → Middle: AI workflows. More power, more cost, more failure modes. → Top: AI agents. Maximum capability, maximum risk, longest time to ship. The higher you climb, the more it costs, the longer it takes, and the more ways it breaks. More risk. Start at the bottom. Only move up when the problem actually demands it. The label "AI consultant" gets you in the door right now. The discipline of solving the real problem with the simplest possible solution is what keeps you there once everyone else catches up.
Pinned
🏆 Weekly Wins Recap | May 23 – May 29
From $64K+ in closed deals to first paid projects, first workflows, and first technical builds - this week inside AIS+ showed what happens when builders stop consuming and start moving. Some wins were big money. Some were first steps. Both matter. 🚀 Standout Wins of the Week inside AIS+ 👉 @Jacob West closed two deals in one week — a $22.5K custom software build for a local gym and a $42K AI OS rollout for a mid-market energy business. 👉 @Luca Giovinazzo delivered his first full client project live — 11 n8n workflows, CRM, Telegram bot, inventory alerts, booking system, KPI tracking, user guide, and Loom walkthrough. 👉 @Fadwa Naboulssi landed her first client three weeks into the community — a candidate sourcing workflow on a $150-per-successful-hire commission. 👉 @George Maitland completed his first technical build using Claude Code + n8n MCP — a local content engine with Telegram as the command center. 👉 @James O Neill built a free portfolio site for a friend-of-a-friend’s side hustle… and she insisted on paying anyway. First real money landed. ⸻ 🎥 Super Win Spotlight | @Josh Holladay Josh joined AIS+ because he wanted more than scattered learning. He wanted momentum. Focused content. Better access. And a room full of people actually moving. Since joining, he has: - Closed real client work - Built stronger confidence around pricing and value - Used the portfolio course to get clear on where he was and what needed to happen next - Learned how to turn client conversations into real business opportunities - Found a place to celebrate wins with people who actually understand the journey
🏆 Weekly Wins Recap | May 23 – May 29
I’m a Full-Stack AI Engineer. Building is what I do best.
Hi, hope you’re doing well. I’m a Full-Stack AI Engineer. Building is what I do best. I help founders build fast, ship MVPs, and scale intelligent products. I’ve delivered real products for agencies and founders and enjoy taking things from 0 → 1, then scaling them further. My work: https://harshsoni.work Building in public on X: https://x.com/harshsoni_hs LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/harshsoni-hs/
How to avoid getting tricked by AI sycophancy.
"Sycophancy refers to the behavior of offering insincere, excessive flattery to someone powerful or wealthy, usually in order to gain a personal advantage, promotion, or special favor." Simply said: AI agrees with everything you say. AI gave you the answer in 28 seconds. But cost you $96K to undo. What happened was... You gave AI a messy decision. It came back in under thirty seconds. Clean structure. Clear recommendation. You forwarded it to your team. Six weeks later you dropped the pricing model it suggested. Two clients didn't follow you into the new structure. At roughly $4,000 a month each, that's $96,000 in ARR you spent the next quarter trying to replace. You gave it a bad input and the AI just returned a polished version of that bad input. You asked: "Should we raise prices?" when the real question was: "Why are clients churning before month three?" The model answered what you asked. The answer was coherent, supported, and built on a frame that was already broken. This is the failure that never shows up in the post-mortem. When a decision goes wrong, founders blame the market, the timing, the execution. Almost never the question they handed AI. Because the output looked credible. Because confident prose signals rigorous thinking. The failure is structural. You were stressed. You opened the chat. You typed the question already forming in your head, assumptions included. The model took your frame and built on it. It does not push back on a loaded question. It runs. Here is what to do before you hand a real decision to AI. Write two things before you open the chat: 1. What you know for certain: Facts you can point to, numbers you have, patterns that have repeated 2. What you're assuming: Things you're treating as true that you haven't verified The second list is where most decisions break. For the pricing example, the fact list had one item: "margins were tighter than last year." The assumption list had five: - "clients would follow the new pricing",
How to avoid getting tricked by AI sycophancy.
1-30 of 18,055
AI Automation Society
skool.com/ai-automation-society
Learn to get paid for AI solutions, regardless of your background.
Leaderboard (30-day)
Powered by