User
Write something
🔒 Q&A w/ Nate is happening in 8 days
Pinned
🚀New Video: Hermes Agent: Zero to Personal AI Assistant (1 Hour Course)
This is a complete walkthrough of getting Hermes Agent set up from scratch on a VPS. You'll see how to install it on Hostinger, connect it to Telegram, set up your first skill and cron job, and back everything up to GitHub. By the end you'll understand the five pillars of Hermes, when to use it instead of Claude Code, and how to scale to multiple agents without breaking anything.
Pinned
Cape Town AI Mastermind: Behind the Scenes
In February, I spent a week in Cape Town, SA with some of the top AI entrepreneurs in the space for a mastermind. We had hundreds of community members join us. I met some amazing people and left feeling so energized and inspired. Which is why I've been uploading almost daily lately, haha! Anyways, just dropped a behind the scenes vlog if you're interested in checking it out. AIS is planning on doing big events and meetups regularly, so if this trip looked like fun, stay tuned for events in the future!
Pinned
🏆 Community Wins Recap | May 2 – May 8
Big closes. AI Lead roles. SaaS momentum. Retainers. Equity. Real systems getting shipped. This week inside AIS+ was packed with builders turning reps into real opportunities 👇 🚀 Standout Wins of the Week inside AIS+ 👉 @James Tagalog landed an AI/Automation Lead role and jumped from $87K → $130K while realizing the interviews cared more about real-world thinking than memorized prep. 👉 Riaz Ahamed crossed $60K+ in client work since joining AIS+ as a complete beginner last year — now building GDPR-compliant Claude Code systems for EU clients. 👉 @Michael Elliott closed a $31K website rebuild + AI chatbot + retainer deal and shared the exact communication moves that helped secure the project. 👉 @Chris Atsu closed a €16K AI automation system for a marketing agency after holding firm through negotiation pressure. 👉 @Fernando Gómez shipped a real estate WhatsApp lead-classification system for a Málaga agency with €3.2K upfront + €299 MRR attached immediately. 🎥 Super Win Spotlight | @Jan Goergen Makinson Jan joined AIS+ after completing the AFT Challenge because he wanted to go deeper into AI automation and surround himself with builders actually doing the work. Since joining, he and his team have: • Built their own property-management SaaS using Claude Code + Lovable • Expanded the software for additional residential complexes in Cyprus • Signed a long-term AI documentation project with a new client • Turned that client relationship into both a monthly retainer AND equity in the company One of the biggest lessons Jan shared: You can learn tools from YouTube…But you can’t replace having helpful people around you when things get difficult.
🏆 Community Wins Recap | May 2 – May 8
Engineering Said 892 Components. Manufacturing Said 886. Procurement Said 901. 🔥
Product launch in 8 weeks. Three departments. Three different component counts. Engineering BOM: 892 components. Manufacturing BOM: 886 components. Procurement BOM: 901 components. Which one is right? All of them had errors. The investigation took 2 weeks. Manually comparing 900+ line items across three Excel files. Finding differences. Tracing root causes. Discovered: - 12 components on engineering BOM not released to manufacturing - 6 obsolete parts still on procurement BOM - 18 quantity discrepancies across all three - 4 duplicate part numbers with different descriptions Built a BOM reconciliation system. Three BOMs uploaded. System extracts: part numbers, descriptions, quantities, revisions. Compares across all sources. Flags discrepancies by category. Generates reconciliation report. Now runs weekly. Catches discrepancies before they become launch delays. Last quarter: - 47 discrepancies caught early - Zero BOM-related production delays - Procurement accuracy: 99.7% (was 94%) The three BOMs will never match perfectly. But now we know exactly where and why they differ. How many versions of truth exist in your data?
N8n vs Make.com
So the question is n8n versus make.com? Which one is better,? They both have their ups and they both have their downs. I’m looking for some personal and professional opinions of how you feel about each program. N8N in my opinion, builds agents better and easier and I feel can do more. Make.com seems to be easier to be working with all the way across but more difficult in building out agents. I like using both platforms and both have their strong points and both have their weaknesses. The other thing that I look at with them is their cost. Self hosting with NAN is great. Don’t get me wrong. It is awesome. I do find a bit of a nuance with the self hosting and that it is something else in addition that I have to keep up with. make.com on the other hand is not self hosted, but is cloud and again building agents are a little more difficult n8n and cost wise make.com is not bad. The other thing is with NAN doing the cloud posting versus self hosting $25 a month for 2500 actual workflow usage is phenomenal. You’re not being charged for each node that is being used in a workflow. But how many times the work flows are triggered. Meaning you can have one workflow and it can run 2500 times for the $25 a month. The big question is what is everybody else’s take an opinion on this matter? I know everybody prefers make over N8N or N8N over make just looking for valued opinions and discussion
1-30 of 16,699
AI Automation Society
skool.com/ai-automation-society
Learn to get paid for AI solutions, regardless of your background.
Leaderboard (30-day)
Powered by