N8n vs Make.com · AI Automation Society

N8n vs Make.com

So the question is n8n versus make.com?

Which one is better,? They both have their ups and they both have their downs. I’m looking for some personal and professional opinions of how you feel about each program.

N8N in my opinion, builds agents better and easier and I feel can do more.

Make.com seems to be easier to be working with all the way across but more difficult in building out agents.

I like using both platforms and both have their strong points and both have their weaknesses. The other thing that I look at with them is their cost. Self hosting with NAN is great. Don’t get me wrong. It is awesome. I do find a bit of a nuance with the self hosting and that it is something else in addition that I have to keep up with.

make.com on the other hand is not self hosted, but is cloud and again building agents are a little more difficult n8n and cost wise make.com is not bad.

The other thing is with NAN doing the cloud posting versus self hosting $25 a month for 2500 actual workflow usage is phenomenal. You’re not being charged for each node that is being used in a workflow. But how many times the work flows are triggered. Meaning you can have one workflow and it can run 2500 times for the $25 a month.

The big question is what is everybody else’s take an opinion on this matter?

I know everybody prefers make over N8N or N8N over make just looking for valued opinions and discussion

7 comments