Ever notice how the conversation about food sounds like two different films… depending on which side of the checkout you live on? Consumer: “I keep hearing red meat is basically a crime.” Producer: “Mate… it’s literally food. From an animal. On grass. Under the sun.” Consumer: “Animal fats? Aren’t those… evil?” Producer: “They’re just fats. Your great-grandparents didn’t have a ‘seed oil aisle’ and somehow they survived.” Consumer: “Sunlight? I’ve been told to avoid it like it’s an ex.” Producer: “We’ve reached the point where humans are indoors all day, then surprised we feel rubbish. Bold strategy.” Consumer: “Salt? Eggs? That’s controversial, right?” Producer: “Only in a world where a neon ‘protein bar’ is ‘wellness’, but a real egg needs a PR team.” And then there’s raw milk, which is exactly where the real gap shows up: Consumers want “natural”. Producers know “natural” still needs standards, safety, and common sense (and yes, laws vary by region). Here’s the missing piece: transparency. Because right now, the consumer is basically expected to trust: - a label - a marketing slogan - and a brand promise While the producer is thinking: - “If you saw how we actually raise this, you’d relax.” That’s where blockchain transparency gets interesting, not as “crypto hype”, but as a practical tool: an immutable record of what happened, where, and when across the supply chain. So instead of arguing about food on the internet, we can verify claims in the real world: origin, handling, audits, welfare, inputs, and standards. So no, this isn’t “producers vs consumers”. It’s confusion vs clarity, and we can close that gap with better conversation and better infrastructure. Let’s translate. 🤝🌱🔗 #Blockchain #Traceability #FoodTransparency #RegenerativeAgriculture #FoodSystems #SupplyChain #ConsumerTrust