Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
What is this?
Less
More

Memberships

The Grow Skool

697 members • Free

Spirited Food

98 members • Free

Regenerative Farming

24 members • Free

Vertical + Urban Farm Academy

184 members • Free

Project Biohacked

10.9k members • Free

Ironclad Immunity Community

17 members • Free

Decentralised Wealth Academy

375 members • Free

9D Breathwork Community

14.7k members • Free

Agriculture/Aquaculture

16 members • Free

164 contributions to The Grow Skool
How much nutrition can we actually add?
With good soil, regenerative practices, natural fertilizer, and the fungal biome intact, how much nutrition can that actually add to produce compared to, we will call it "plain" agriculture? I'm interested in the parts that help create nutrition. Biochar is essential. Clean water is essential. How far can we go? What problems do you think that can solve? I can think of a whole bunch.
1 like • 2h
We need to be careful with biochar. Not all biochar is equal, and the origin of the feedstock is essential because source material and production conditions directly affect how it behaves in the soil. Biochar can be a powerful tool, but only when it is matched to the specific needs of the soil and the biology already at work within it. Research shows its function in soil depends heavily on feedstock source and pyrolysis or heat drum conditions, not just on the label “biochar.” Nature-based solutions for nutrient delivery are incredibly important if we want to reduce denitrification and volatilization and keep nutrients cycling where they belong: in the soil-plant system. That is where biochar, biofertilizers, and biostimulants all become part of the arsenal. Used properly, they can support microbial activity, improve nutrient efficiency, and help build a more resilient soil system rather than forcing short-term responses. Evidence from biochar-amended systems suggests improvements in soil nutrient status and, in some cases, lower nitrous oxide emissions relative to other organic amendments. BIOCHAR, BIOFERTILIZERS, and BIOSTIMULANTS are all part of the toolkit, but only if we first understand what the soil actually needs. WEOC — water-extractable organic carbon — is especially important because it reflects the readily available carbon that feeds soil biology and supports nutrient cycling. It tells us far more about active soil function than broad assumptions ever will.
1 like • 20m
@Andrew Brooks You’re aiming in the right direction 🤠 I just think living soil from vermiculture does more on its own than biochar ever will. We use char to enhance, not replace, the living biology already at work. Biochar has caught a big tailwind, but somewhere along the way people forgot the essence of it: it comes from fire.
Biking to Bali with Yungcheezy
This guy is brilliant. The scenery is wild, the farm landscapes are stunning, and the whole journey is genuinely worth following. I’ve been watching from day 7 and it has been incredible to see it unfold. If you have TikTok, you’ll love this. If you don’t, this might be a pretty good reason to get it. https://www.tiktok.com/@yungcheeezy?_r=1&_t=ZS-94V1NnIULpN
0 likes • 15h
Wow! Thats quite the ride...
Focus on the soil microbial hotspots 🔎🌱
Some interesting Weekend edification... 🦠 Soil productivity is not a uniform state; it is a high-stakes performance driven by microbial hotspots. These localized interfaces (where metabolic activity is 10–100x higher than bulk soil) are defined by the plant’s strategic carbon investment and architectural influence. 🌱 RHIZOPLANE & RHIZOSPHERE -> The rhizoplane (root surface) and rhizosphere (the surrounding few millimeters) function as the primary zones of carbon transfer. -> Plants inject 20–60% of their photosynthetates here, creating a high-flux environment of sugars and amino acids. -> This massive carbon pump fuels a copiotrophic expansion, driving intense microbial growth and rapid nutrient cycling at the point of plant uptake. 🛡️ DETRITUSPHERE DYNAMICS -> The Detritusphere acts as the soil's specialized decomposition interface. -> Unlike the labile, sugar-rich rhizosphere, this zone is dominated by complex polymers such as cellulose and lignin from senescent roots and leaf litter. -> Successional microbial communities specialize here, degrading macromolecular organic matter and providing a functional buffer that complements active plant exudation. ⌬ AGGREGATES -> Soil aggregates serve as a critical biological microhabitat. -> Roots and fungal hyphae deploy extracellular polysaccharides (EPS) as biochemical adhesives to mesh mineral particles into stable structures. -> These aggregates provide a physical refuge for beneficial microorganisms, shielding them from protozoan predation while simultaneously optimizing water retention and carbon sequestration. ⚡ BIOPORES -> Biopores (conduits created by macrofauna or decayed roots) function as the soil’s primary macro-infrastructure. -> These channels dictate the spatial expansion of the rhizosphere, facilitating rapid gas exchange ( flux) and efficient hydraulic transport. -> By acting as preferential habitats, biopores allow copiotrophic microorganisms to thrive deep within the soil profile, extending biological activity beyond the primary root system.
1
0
Focus on the soil microbial hotspots 🔎🌱
34% of sceptical farmers called carbon farming a “scam.”
That figure comes from independent research with more than 400 NSW farmers. When we first read it, we had to sit with it. Because we know where that comes from. These are families who have watched the “next big thing” roll through for generations. They’ve sat at kitchen tables with people promising high returns and leaving behind risk, paperwork, and uncertainty. So when a farmer says, “It’s a scam,” what we hear is: “I am protecting my family and my land from being used.” And they’re right to be cautious. That’s why we stopped trying to convince people. We’re not here to chase farmers or sell dreams. We listen to real problems and build solutions together. We work with families ready to question everything. Operators who run their farms as high-functioning systems and want hard data on what their work is truly worth. Protecting the farm doesn’t mean standing still. Here’s the honest truth: This work is rigorous. It requires transparency. It demands an honest look at each other’s businesses. If you want a quick fix or a passive cheque, we’re not the right fit, and that’s okay. But if you’re tired of the same old struggle and ready to do something about it, let’s talk. Bring your hard questions. Because the difference between a scam and a strategy is trust, evidence, and shared risk. This is the GROW NETWORK...Let's talk carbon What are your thoughts on Carbon Farming?
0 likes • 1d
Great idea! 💡
1-10 of 164
Neil Smith
5
102points to level up
@neil-smith-9629
Farm and Ranch Aficionado!! Join Grow Skool : 🌱 https://www.skool.com/thegrowskool/about?ref=aba63094dd674d55a620e117628029bf 🌱 ✨

Active 19m ago
Joined Aug 28, 2025
INTJ
Canada
Powered by