Two images One is real One is an AI influencer with 121K+ followers Comment 1 or 2 below 👇 I’ll reveal the answer later this evening and break down what gives it away This is how realistic AI visuals have become

One of the most overlooked barriers to AI adoption is not fear, skepticism, or lack of access. It is overthinking. The habit of analyzing, preparing, and evaluating AI endlessly, while rarely engaging with it in practice. It feels responsible, even intelligent, but over time it quietly stalls learning and erodes confidence. ------------- Context: When Preparation Replaces Progress ------------- In many teams and organizations, AI is talked about constantly. Articles are shared, tools are compared, use cases are debated, and risks are examined from every angle. On the surface, this looks like thoughtful adoption. Underneath, it often masks a deeper hesitation to begin. Overthinking AI is socially acceptable. It sounds prudent to say we are still researching, still learning, still waiting for clarity. There is safety in staying theoretical. As long as AI remains an idea rather than a practice, we are not exposed to mistakes, limitations, or uncertainty. At an individual level, this shows up as consuming content without experimentation. Watching demos instead of trying workflows. Refining prompts in our heads instead of testing them in context. We convince ourselves we are getting ready, when in reality we are standing still. The cost of this pattern is subtle. Nothing breaks. No failure occurs. But learning never fully starts. And without practice, confidence has nowhere to grow. ------------- Insight 1: Thinking Feels Safer Than Acting ------------- Thinking gives us the illusion of control. When we analyze AI from a distance, we remain in familiar territory. We can evaluate risks, compare options, and imagine outcomes without putting ourselves on the line. Using AI, by contrast, introduces exposure. The output might be wrong. The interaction might feel awkward. We might not know how to respond. These moments challenge our sense of competence, especially in environments where expertise is valued. Overthinking becomes a way to protect identity. As long as we are still “learning about AI,” we cannot be judged on how well we use it. The problem is that this protection comes at a price. We trade short-term comfort for long-term capability.

One of the most persistent myths about AI fluency is that it requires big changes. New systems, redesigned workflows, or dramatic shifts in how we work. This belief quietly stalls progress because it makes adoption feel heavier than it needs to be. In reality, long-term fluency with AI is almost always built through small, consistent adjustments rather than sweeping transformations. ------------- Context: Why We Overestimate the Size of Change ------------- When people think about becoming “good” with AI, they often imagine a future version of themselves who works completely differently. Their days look restructured. Their tools look unfamiliar. Their thinking feels more advanced. That imagined gap can feel intimidating enough to delay action altogether. In organizations, this shows up as waiting for perfect systems. Teams postpone experimentation until tools are approved, policies are finalized, or training programs are complete. While these steps matter, they often create the impression that meaningful progress only happens after a major rollout. At an individual level, the same pattern appears. We wait for uninterrupted time, for clarity, for confidence. We assume that if we cannot change everything, it is not worth changing anything. As a result, adoption stalls before it begins. Micro-adaptations challenge this assumption. They suggest that fluency does not come from overhaul. It comes from accumulation. ------------- Insight 1: Fluency Is Built Through Repetition, Not Intensity ------------- Fluency with AI looks impressive from the outside, but its foundations are remarkably ordinary. It is built through repeated exposure to similar tasks, similar decisions, and similar patterns of interaction. Small, repeated uses allow us to notice how AI responds to our inputs over time. We begin to see what stays consistent and what varies. This pattern recognition is what turns novelty into intuition. Intense bursts of experimentation can feel productive, but they often fade quickly. Without repetition, learning remains shallow. Micro-adaptations, by contrast, embed learning into everyday work where it has a chance to stick.