I have a concern about how the competition’s source-code requirements are presented. The Ownership section on the official rules page states: “Builders retain ownership of their Mini App, code, and intellectual property but release the App and code under the MIT License.” Although developers retain ownership, MIT allows anyone—including Nimiq—to copy, modify, and commercially distribute the code without paying the original developer royalties, provided the required copyright and license notices are preserved. This also applies to submissions that receive no prize. That requirement is easy to miss. You have to visit a separate rules page to see it, while the submission flow starts by asking you to connect your GitHub account. Could the public-source and MIT-license requirements be displayed prominently at the start of that flow, before connecting GitHub? I understand the goal of growing an open-source ecosystem, but retaining ownership doesn’t mean retaining exclusive commercial rights. Participants should clearly understand that they are publishing commercially reusable software in exchange for a chance at winning. Could the team clarify how Nimiq intends to use submitted projects, including non-winning entries, and whether it plans to incorporate or commercialize any of that code? Also, what exact permissions does connecting GitHub grant? Does it only verify our identity, or can it access repositories or make changes? Access to unrelated private projects should not be necessary to enter.