https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ySBY_tPUguM

Incase there were any doubts, here's Ben Shapiro himself reaffirming that the goal was never regime change and that U.S doesn't need regime change to achieve its goals. Now lets see if people here call Ben Shapiro an IRGC agent sewing division between the west and Pahlavi supporters...https://youtu.be/PVeU0qnZHCg?si=DHJYMXogV6XItxn8

I'm visiting a Sharia international voice chat room again. First bit of it when I logged in is ''We gotta kill all these faggots''. The argument within is also of the ''We're global, unlike YOU...we want global not just Sharia in Iran. '' I recognize these same voices from the other day including the leader personality. The younger, more intelligent seemingly westernized ones give push back to the one who claims Saudi home. This is live with me. I'm just listening. The disputes within this Shia room are surprising. They're all fighting with each other over IRGC and how to best kill more Jews and who's more dedicated to killing Americans and blah blah. Now it's theology arguments just tearing each other apart with holy book arguments back and forth. When I spent 3 hours here the other day I just asked questions, rarely voicing an opinion...but it was always the same...''Jews must go home to where they came from''...and I wouldn't agree or disagree. I'd just ask questions to creep in to their mindset. I felt like I needed a high pressure shower by a nozzle built for an elephant after.

On April 1st, 2001, the Netherlands became the first nation in human history to legalize same-sex marriage. Years later, in 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court likewise declared marriage a fundamental right protected by the Constitution. President Barack Obama, in a speech at the Rose Garden, declared "love is love" as he celebrated the ruling as "a victory for America." And most Americans seem to agree. A gallop poll suggests that approximately 88% of democrats and nearly 50% of Republicans support gay marriage. So it seems the debate is over. But should it be? In 2007, an Assumptionist priest by the name of Barry Bercier wrote in his book, Skies of Babylon, that if traditional marriage were re-defined to include same sex couples, "the result would be nothing less than the end of the world of man." Sound dramatic? Well -- what is marriage? If marriage were merely a proclamation of love, and if the fundamental purpose of marriage were to reward people who love each other, then gay marriage should be legal. But society does not give certain legal rights, financial benefits and tax breaks to people simply because they fall in love. At least, until two decades ago, that's not how it worked. Barry Bercier defines marriage as "the public and legal recognition of the pre-political duality of the sexes and the significance of the duality for human beings and the social and political order." In other words, marriage -- traditional marriage as it existed across every civilization for nearly all of human history, is the recognition of a unique relationship that pre-exists law and human constructs. That is, the institution of marriage - from Mesopotamia, to Egypt, China, Rome and every Western nation until 2001 -- recognized the duality of the sexes through law because the duality is the nucleus from which life emerges. The relationship between male and female -- man and woman -- whether you are gay, straight, black, white, bisexual, asexual, rich or poor, is our beginning; our source. For every human being, the duality of the sexes is our 'sine qua non' -- without it, life would not exist.