Happy Saturday everyone! Just a reminder that Throne is doing a giveaway for all orders placed during the month of April with my code (HACKSMITH). 2x winners. One will win: GHK-Cu Soap Bar GHK-Cu Serum Another will win: $100 Throne store credit https://www.madebythrone.com/?ref=HACKSMITH People REALLY love their GHK-Cu soap bar. I’ve seen numerous people who have had it clear up acne. So worth a try if you’re curious :)

By this point, most of you have probably seen the clip from the Shawn Ryan podcast and if you've researched BPC-157, you've seen the warning about it promoting angiogenesis, therefore it must feed cancer, therefore it's dangerous. This is what all of the fear mongerers try to push to support their narrative. But this argument leaves out some pretty important context about how cancer and angiogenesis actually work. Angiogenesis is normal. It's how your body heals. Every cut, sprain, or torn muscle triggers angiogenesis to deliver oxygen and nutrients to the damaged tissue. So it's not some process that only occurs with the use of BPC-157 and instead is a very fundamental part of being alive and healing. What they constantly leave out of the argument is that tumors already drive their own angiogenesis. This is where the "BPC157 = cancer fuel" argument really falls apart. For a cancer to grow beyond roughly 1mm, it has to build its own blood supply [1]. So what does it do and how is it going to create this for itself? It produces its own chemical signals and secretes them into surrounding tissue! When these signals reach endothelial cells, it binds to receptors on their surface, activating relay proteins that travel into the nucleus and switch on the genes needed to grow new blood vessels [1]. Without that vascular support, tumors can become necrotic or even apoptotic [1]. In other words, the tumor manufactures the trigger itself to keep themselves from dying. Some have called this the "angiogenic switch" where proliferating tumors activate an angiogenic phenotype to meet their oxygen and nutrient demand, along with the release of anti-apoptotic factors from the new vasculature to aid in their survival. To progress, tumors actively shift the balance of the body's endogenous angiogenesis inducers and inhibitors toward a pro-angiogenic outcome [2]. So these cancer cells aren't just sitting there waiting for you to inject BPC-157 to create a trigger for their growth. They are the trigger!

This is copied over from the Facebook community. Here is some thoughts on a post that was made there... The other day this was posted: Hey ya’ll! Rat has been using r3ta for 4-5 months and lost a significant amount of weight. Rat’s food suppression has faded and has 10-15 more lbs to go. What have you stacked with R3ta to help cut the last few lbs and anything to add for food suppression? I keep reading T3sa and Motzsee. I commented that I disagreed with basically every comment (which by the way was to either add Tz or Cag). No shade to the original poster BTW. Here was my response when someone asked why I wouldn't add in other compounds: if someone has the last 10-15lbs left to lose, then Tess is going to cause temporary gain for one. If someone is in a stall and are tied to what the scale says, they're not going to like Tess. M0TS can be fine. It's also expensive and doesn't work for everyone. Half the comments are recommending things that cause more suppression (silly). Here's the more important piece of this: They've been on for 4-5 months and lost a significant amount. Now they said suppression has faded and have 10-15lbs more to lose. Question 1: How much are they using? Could they not just bump that up before stacking and adding all of these compounds? 4-5 months in following a normal titration schedule (which I hate BTW) won't put you at the max, so this person likely has room to go up. Question 2: At any point during this significant amount of loss did they recalculate calories? Are they even in a caloric deficit anymore? Question 3: Are they even in a stall? Everyone said all of these compounds to take. The person literally only said they had less suppression. That's it. They didn't say they were stuck, gaining, etc. There's SO much more but that in itself is enough to support the point that I'm trying to get across here. I've posted the stall-breaking cheat sheet in here before. There are a million things people can do before adding another compound. Why do we not do those?

Good morning everybody! Peptira 25% off sale and a massive giveaway where they're giving away 40 kits of 5-amino 1-MQ to various winners is live! Link to order: https://peptira.com/?ref=hacksmith Discount code: HACKSMITH

Has anyone experienced depression while using or induced by Reta? Is there anything you used to remedy this?