Quick desk question for the room — process only, not a trade call. 🧭 A few of you have been chewing on how you set risk limits when markets get jumpy (fixed rules vs tightening when volatility jumps). If you're willing to share education-style: - Do you keep a fixed ceiling, or do you tighten when things get loud? 📏 - What do you refuse to do when you're tempted to push size? 🚫 No tickers-as-advice. No "what should I buy." No target numbers in the comments — just the rules you actually follow so newer members can steal the hygiene, not the bravado. I'll jump in with framing from the live desks (and point at Course Hub where it helps). Educational only — not financial advice. You keep self-custody of your assets. No guaranteed outcomes.

Yesterday, I started a Public Portfolio (no joke). I will show every step I make. I opened a single sided LP $1000 cbBTC/USDC and I will document every step on X.

Instead of using my SOL as collateral (it has been a terrible form of collateral this draw down) I'm testing to stake them on the Zeus protocol to earn btcSOL. Does anyone have experience with it?

I've been testing out this basis trade where I go long and short on the same asset and am able to earn a nice funding rate. This tool that David built, called Trader's Bible, is working very well. It makes it easy to access a lot of the information that GMX makes it hard. Checking on this tool daily to make sure that I have a positive funding rate on my short. What are the main risks associated with this strategy? Here are the risks that come to the top of my mind and I count on you guys to let me know if I'm missing something. - Counterparty risk - Smart contract risk - De-Pegging risk - Funding rate change risk - oracle risk Since there is no directional risk with this strategy because it's neutral, what else could possibly go wrong?

Battle for Optimal Fees !! and The Quest for Sustainable LP yields