Quick update · Checkmate The Matrix

Quick update

I’m just over two weeks out to going to court with Azzuros legal team on a business credit card debt with a personal guarantee signed. Today I’ve posted off my court bundle to both the judge and their solicitors. They have made a couple of mistakes such as responding to my SAR 1 day late and I feel pretty comfortable understanding the angle of the strategy to take, well enough to defend myself in layman terms to the judge.

However that’s my concern now, the judge. If they reject the argument of the deed of assignment and side with the debt collectors that this is a stalling tactic then the whole case will fall apart, any advice on how to avoid this?

I’ve been pretty clear in my skeletal argument about focusing on the deed of assignment and that it is a vital to the case regardless of debt being owed. I’m not arguing the original debt I’m happy to say I owe that in court to capital on tap just not Azzuros. I just don’t like the idea of being rail rolled in court now that Azzuros solicitors has a copy of my court bundle so are going to look at how to defend against it.

17 comments