Friday Fixes: Your Premise Is Too Vague

Friday Fixes | DragonWorks Publishing

Every Friday I fix one thing. One specific author problem, one diagnostic, one solution. Fast and usable.

This week: the vague premise.

The Symptom

You can describe your story for three minutes and the person listening nods politely and says "sounds interesting" without asking a single follow-up question.

Or you sit down to write your blurb and realize you can't get it under two hundred words without it feeling incomplete.

Or you're three chapters in and you keep starting scenes and stopping because you're not quite sure what the chapter needs to do.

All three symptoms. Same root problem. The premise isn't sharp enough.

The Diagnostic: Three Questions

Run your premise through these three questions. If you can't answer all three in one sentence each, you've found the gap.

Question 1: Who wants what and why can't they have it?

This is character plus goal plus obstacle, in one sentence. Not backstory. Not theme. Not world description. Just: who, what, and the specific thing standing in the way.

Vague: "A woman discovers her small town has a dark secret."

Sharp: "A newly hired librarian discovers the town's beloved founding family covered up a murder, and the only person who can confirm it is the family's ninety-year-old matriarch who has every reason to keep lying."

The sharp version has a specific protagonist, a specific goal, and a specific obstacle with a human face. The vague version could describe four hundred books.

Question 2: What does failing cost?

Stakes. Not "she'll be sad" or "things will get worse." What specific, concrete, irreversible thing happens if the protagonist doesn't succeed?

The stakes are what make the reader care whether the story resolves. No stakes, no tension. No tension, no reason to keep reading.

Question 3: What makes this version of the story the only one?

There are hundreds of cozy mysteries about small-town librarians. What is the specific combination of character, conflict, and consequence that makes yours the one worth reading? This is usually a twist on the familiar setup, a subverted expectation, or a character with a very specific reason to care that nobody else has.

If you can't answer this one, you're not missing a premise element. You're missing a point of view.

The Fix: The 50-Word Compression Test

Take your current premise description and rewrite it to answer all three questions in under fifty words. Force the constraint. You'll find the vague parts immediately because they'll resist compression.

Vague premises feel like they have a lot of room in them. That room is actually empty space where the story hasn't been decided yet. Fill it before you draft, not chapter by chapter.

If You're Still Stuck: Four DIY Techniques That Work

Sometimes the diagnostic tells you something is wrong but not what to put there instead. These techniques help you find the missing element rather than just knowing it's missing.

The "but therefore" chain.

Screenwriters use this one and it's brutal in the best way. Take your premise and try to connect its events with "but" and "therefore" instead of "and then."

"And then" connects scenes. "But" and "therefore" create causality.

If you can't connect your premise elements with "but" and "therefore," your premise is a sequence of events, not a story. The obstacle in Question 1 should be a "but." The stakes in Question 2 should be a "therefore."

Try it on your current premise and see where the chain breaks.

The "take it away" test.

Identify the thing your protagonist wants most. Now ask: what happens if they simply don't get it? If the answer is "not much, honestly" or "they'd probably be fine eventually," your stakes aren't real yet.

Real stakes create a situation where the protagonist has no good option. Failing costs something specific. Succeeding costs something too, ideally. The tension lives in the trap, not just the goal.

The "only this character" test.

Could your premise work with a different protagonist? If yes, your protagonist isn't the right one yet.

The character and the conflict should be so specifically matched that swapping the character changes the story entirely. Your librarian protagonist should have a reason to pursue this particular cover-up that no one else in town has. Her specific background, wound, or want should be the thing that makes her the only person this story could happen to.

When character and conflict are truly matched, the premise sharpens automatically.

The "say it in a bar" test.

Pretend you're telling a stranger about your story at a bar. They've had one drink. They're friendly but they're also half-watching the game.

You have about thirty seconds.

What do you say?

If you find yourself starting with world backstory or character history, you're not at the premise yet. The thirty-second version is always: who, what's in their way, and what it costs them if they fail. If you can't do it in thirty seconds, the premise has vague parts you haven't resolved.

How the Brainstorm Room Helps With This Specifically

The Brainstorm Room inside WordCrafter.Pro was built for exactly the situation where you know something is soft but you can't quite see where.

It's a team of six distinct creative voices, not a single AI giving you a pep talk. And the way they approach a vague premise is different from the diagnostic above, which is why they're complementary rather than redundant.

Here's what actually happens when you bring a soft premise into the room:

The host reads what you've brought and immediately asks the question that matters, not the question on a checklist. Often something like: "What part of this idea keeps you up at night?" That question is doing work. It's looking for the heat, the thing you're actually excited about, because a vague premise usually means the author hasn't found the part they care about yet. When you find that part, the rest sharpens around it.

One of the room's voices is specifically wired to find the shadow in every concept. When you pitch a soft premise, this voice asks what the surface version is hiding. "That's the interesting part, but what's the version nobody wants to admit?" This is how a lot of premises go from "woman discovers a dark secret" to something with a specific human villain and a moral complication that makes the resolution matter.

Another voice sits in the reader's chair throughout the conversation. She doesn't care about craft or structure. She asks: would she keep reading? She surfaces at the exact moment when the room has gotten excited about something that's still missing the emotional hook a reader needs. Her question cuts through fast.

The architect in the room stays quiet until something structural is actually wrong, and then says one specific thing. "That works, but only if X is also true." For a vague premise, that one note is often the load-bearing piece you were missing.

The session ends with a Brainstorm Brief: a half-page summary that includes a working logline, the central tension, what you're most excited about, and a note on whether the concept is structurally ready to move forward. That brief is the sharp version of your premise, arrived at through conversation rather than a blank page stare.

The diagnostic questions above are for authors who work better alone. The Brainstorm Room is for authors who think better in conversation, or who've run the diagnostic and still can't see the gap clearly.

Both paths end at the same place: a premise specific enough to draft from.

The Tool in Progress

The Premise Sharpener plugin I'm building walks through the three-question diagnostic as a short interview, then generates three refined versions of your premise at different angles so you can see which direction has the most pull. It's a faster, more focused version of the same process.

Not available yet. Coming to the Skool classroom when it ships.

Next Friday: why your opening three pages are the most expensive real estate in your book and how to diagnose what's going wrong there.

3 comments

Friday Fixes: Your Premise Is Too Vague