Poster system template that turns any celebrity into a high-end tribute piece All built using the same framework 👇 This style works because: • The main black & white silhouette becomes the “container” • Career moments are rebuilt as a textured photo grid • Selective color adds rhythm instead of chaos • Typography stays small, controlled, premium It feels like something you’d see in a design annual or gallery, not just a random collage 💡 How to Use This 1. Replace [PERSON NAME] 2. Use high-quality career images 3. Apply textures (halftone, fabric, film grain) 4. Keep color accents minimal and intentional 5. Respect the micro-scaling typography rules Don’t oversize the name Don’t over-color the grid Restraint is what makes it premium Prompt 👇 [PERSON NAME]. Act as a high-end sports graphic designer creating a conceptual tribute poster. The style is a complex "dual exposure photo-grid composite" with mixed-media textures. **CENTRAL STRUCTURE (THE VESSEL):** The central focus is a large-scale, high-contrast black and white portrait silhouette of [PERSON NAME]. This main portrait acts as the container. **THE GRID FILL & TEXTURES (MIXED MEDIA):** The interior of the silhouette is populated by a dense "photo mosaic grid" of action shots from the person's career. **CRITICAL TEXTURE INSTRUCTION:** Do not just paste flat photos. Apply artistic textures to various grid cells to create a tactile, collage feel. Use effects like: - **Halftone Dots:** Comic-book style raster patterns on some cells. - **Fabric/Embroidery:** Subtle thread or canvas textures suggesting a jersey or patch. - **Film Grain:** Heavy noise on specific high-contrast action shots. **COLOR STRATEGY:** The base is Monochrome B&W. Use selective color overlays (relevant to the team/flag) ONLY on specific grid cells to create a rhythm. **TYPOGRAPHY & BRANDING (STRICT MICRO-SCALING):** 1. **Top Left (The Name):** Write "[PERSON NAME]" strictly using the font **Inter Semibold**.

Hey everyone! 👋 I’ve been diving deep into AI automation recently and have been exploring different tools to build workflows efficiently. One topic I keep seeing pop up in discussions is the choice between Make.com and n8n. As someone who primarily uses Make.com, I’ve been loving the visual workflow builder, the wide range of integrations, and how quickly I can get things running. That said, I’m curious to understand other perspectives: many people in the community mention n8n as a more advanced or flexible option, and I’d love to hear what specifically makes it stand out to you. I know every builder has their own workflow style and priorities, so there’s probably no “one size fits all.” But I think it’s helpful to share experiences and trade-offs, especially for those of us still learning the ropes and trying to decide where to focus our time. So here’s my question to the community: - If you’ve used both, what’s the biggest difference you’ve noticed between Make.com and n8n? - If you had to recommend one to someone starting out or trying to grow quickly, which would it be and why? - Are there specific use cases where you think one clearly wins over the other? I’d love to learn from your experiences and start a discussion here — I’m sure there’s a lot we can all take away from each other’s insights.