Are these emails too simple (writen follow-ups - bad or good?)
Nowadays I do a bit of research on someone, then keep a few of the email sentences the same. My style is going for a quick yes or no. Sometimes, if I see an opening, Iâll ask something like: âHey, saw youâre dealing with a lot of critique. Can imagine itâs hard to defend your methodology in the comments, has it gotten easier over the years!?â But most of the time, I keep it simple and go with this: Message 1: Hey Alan, Like the unique training videos on Instagram. Indeed not repetitive. Also noticed you're pushing a 6 Week FUNCTIONAL SHRED CHALLENGE. I got a cool way to let more people participate in your 6 week challenge. Can I share what I had mind? - Matt Message 2: Alan, Know you're busy and getting many messages like these. If we decided to do this, I'd focus on bringing people clicked "Get Started" and left their email on the 6 week challenge back in without upfront cost to you or you needing to lift a finger. Not promising this would work, but pretty sure it can. What do you think? - Matt Message 3: Usually itâs done by sending five simple, 6th-grade-level emails and a Google Doc. Weâd start with a small test first. Everything written in your voice. Then Iâd only follow up 1â1 with the people who responded to one of the five emailsâworking through the list after we test a small portion and clearly see thereâs interest. Worth testing, you think? â Matt ________ Message 4: dumb idea? Message 5: Happy to park here if it's not useful Message 6: If bringing people to the finish line who were interested but didn't buy ever becomes of interest, I'm around. Rooting for you eitherway, -Matt Any suggestions, or does this look pretty decent? Open for hearing feedback.