Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
What is this?
Less
More

Memberships

‎Skoolyard 🧃

1k members • Free

AI Automation (A-Z)

153.4k members • Free

Free Skool Course

66.5k members • Free

AI Automation Society

350.1k members • Free

High Vibe Tribe

80.5k members • Free

New Earth Network

24 members • Free

New Earth Community

7.1k members • Free

AI Automation Agency Hub

314.2k members • Free

55 contributions to The AI Advantage
What I learned about AI, including AUTOMATION as a non-coder: THINK PUZZLES without a PICTURE
A SIMPLE AI ECOSYSTEM USED WELL, BEATS A COMPLICATED ONE USED BADLY You do not need to be a coder to work well with AI. You do not need to speak in technical language. You do not need to build complicated automations before you understand what you are actually trying to achieve. You need to talk to AI clearly. Tell it what you do. Tell it what you want. Tell it what success looks like. That is the bit many beginners miss. A lot of people approach AI like they are trying to solve one tiny puzzle piece at a time: “What prompt do I use for this?” “What command do I type?” “What tool do I connect?” “What automation should I build?” That can work, but it can also create confusion very quickly. A better way, especially for creative thinkers, is to start with the whole picture. Think of a jigsaw puzzle. If someone gives you a thousand pieces but does not show you the picture on the box, you might still make progress, but it will be slow, frustrating, and full of guesswork. Now imagine the picture is the Titanic. If the Titanic is still in Southampton, you have useful context. You can see the ship, the dock, the land, the colours, the structure. You can start to understand where the pieces belong. But if the Titanic is halfway across the Atlantic, surrounded by sea and sky, everything starts to look the same. Blue above, blue below, no landmarks, no clear edges. That is what happens when you ask AI for isolated pieces without giving it the picture. The AI may still help, but it is guessing with you. So my biggest learning is this: Do not start by asking AI for one puzzle piece. Start by showing it the picture on the box. Say something like: “I am trying to build a simple workflow that helps me create, organise, and publish content without overwhelming myself. I am not a coder. I want low friction, clear steps, and reusable prompts. Success means I can use this every week without getting lost.” That is much more powerful than asking: “What is the best prompt for automation?”
What I learned about AI, including AUTOMATION as a non-coder: THINK PUZZLES without a PICTURE
✨2025 Participant back to see what’s new 2026!
I completed last years AI advantage summit and I’m back to see what Tony and Dean have cooked up for us this year! Who here has already been using AI?👇🏼 What is your favorite tool? 👇🏼 Let’s get this party started!
✨2025 Participant back to see what’s new 2026!
@Theresa Elliott YOU are AWESOME, Theresa. I knew that already. YOU AND SABRINA? OMG 🔥 🔥 🔥!!!! Can’t wait to see what Girl power can do! I’m a Guy… any chance I can join your Skool as a voyeur, just to get that What if God was a Girl? Vibe?
📰 AI News: An AI-Generated Song Just Hit No. 1 on iTunes, and That Changes the Music Conversation Fast
📝 TL;DR An AI-generated track reportedly reached No. 1 on the U.S. and global iTunes charts, and that is a much bigger deal than a novelty headline. It shows AI music is no longer just experimental, it is starting to compete in the same commercial spaces as human artists. 🧠 Overview According to recent reporting, the AI-generated song “Celebrate Me” by the virtual artist IngaRose climbed to the top of the U.S. and global iTunes charts around April 17. That matters because this is not just about one viral song, it is a signal that AI-generated music is becoming mainstream enough to win real consumer attention. The bigger issue is not whether AI can make a song anymore, it is whether audiences care who or what made it. 📜 The Announcement The reporting says “Celebrate Me” was released on March 31, 2026 and quickly rose up the iTunes sales charts, hitting No. 1 in the U.S. and globally. IngaRose is presented as an AI-generated act, and the song is believed to have been made using Suno, one of the biggest AI music tools in the market. While AI music has already been gaining traction on streaming platforms, this chart milestone gives the trend a much more visible and commercially credible moment. ⚙️ How It Works • Virtual artist model - IngaRose appears to be positioned as a synthetic music act rather than a traditional human performer. • AI music generation - The song is widely reported to have been created using Suno, a platform that can generate vocals, instrumentals, and full songs from prompts. • Chart momentum - “Celebrate Me” reportedly climbed to No. 1 on both U.S. and global iTunes sales charts in mid-April. • Fast commercial validation - This was not just a niche tech demo, it translated into actual purchases and chart performance. • Blurred authorship - The song’s success raises familiar questions about who should get creative credit when AI tools do much of the production work.
  📰 AI News: An AI-Generated Song Just Hit No. 1 on iTunes, and That Changes the Music Conversation Fast
0 likes • 11d
Thanks for the heads up. I’m deep in this space myself at the moment, incubating 100+ Suno tracks, and a handful already feel like they may have genuine commercial potential. That’s why this matters. The conversation is moving very quickly from “can AI make music?” to “what happens when AI music starts competing seriously in the market?” To me, the deeper issue is not only music generation. It is trust, disclosure, and authorship. When songs, visuals, artist personas, and distribution can all be spun up at low cost, the real questions become: Who made this? How was it made? Was it disclosed clearly? And will audiences care enough to differentiate? AI is not removing the need for taste. It is raising the value of taste, truth, and transparency.
🧪 AI as a Lab Assistant: Why the Next Time Win May Come From Faster Experimentation, Not Just Faster Content
A lot of AI conversation still circles around content. Faster drafts, quicker summaries, more polished outputs. Those are useful gains, but they are not the whole story. One of the more interesting shifts right now is the idea of AI as a lab assistant, not just in science, but in any environment where people are testing ideas, comparing options, and learning through iteration. That matters because some of the greatest time savings do not come from producing the first answer faster. They come from shortening the cycle of experimentation itself. ------------- Context ------------- Many teams spend more time than they realize waiting to learn. They test an idea, pause for feedback, reconsider the framing, gather more inputs, and then try again. That loop can take days or weeks, even when the actual insight needed to move forward is relatively small. This is true in product development, strategy, content, marketing, operations, and internal process design. The slowdown is often not in making something. It is in comparing possibilities, spotting patterns, and deciding which direction deserves the next investment of effort. That is why the “lab assistant” framing is so useful. It positions AI as a tool for helping teams explore options faster, organize findings more clearly, and reduce the cost of trying something imperfect. The benefit is not simply that it generates material. The benefit is that it helps the team learn sooner. And learning sooner is a time advantage. When feedback loops shorten, wasted effort shrinks. Teams spend less time building the wrong thing too far and more time adjusting while the cost of change is still low. ------------- Faster Iteration Beats Slower Certainty ------------- A lot of organizations still work as if certainty should come before experimentation. They want the fully formed plan, the polished idea, the complete answer. That sounds responsible, but it often stretches cycle time because too much effort is invested before enough learning has happened.
🧪 AI as a Lab Assistant: Why the Next Time Win May Come From Faster Experimentation, Not Just Faster Content
2 likes • 14d
Strong post Igor, and yes I’ll be there! I think this gets closer to the real leverage point. AI is useful for faster drafts, yes. But the bigger gain may come from shortening the distance between question and insight. When experimentation becomes cheaper, teams can test more, learn sooner, and commit with better judgment. That reduces rework, lowers the cost of weak assumptions, and improves decision quality before too much time has been sunk. So the AI advantage is not just content speed. It is learning velocity. And in fast-moving environments, that may be the metric that matters most.
🚀 The Entrepreneurs Who Will Own the Next Decade Are Doing This Right Now
The next decade will not be owned by the busiest entrepreneurs. It will be owned by the ones building leverage early, and using AI to do it faster. Right now, while many people are still stuck in reaction mode, the smartest entrepreneurs are doing something different. They are learning faster, simplifying faster, and using AI to remove the kind of friction that slows growth down. They are not just working harder. They are building smarter ways to operate. That is the real separator. The future does not belong to people who simply put in more hours. It belongs to people who know how to make each hour produce more. That is exactly where AI comes in. AI helps entrepreneurs reclaim time from the tasks that quietly drain momentum every week. It can speed up research, generate first drafts, organize ideas, summarize meetings, improve planning, streamline communication, and reduce the manual work that keeps people stuck in the weeds. What used to take an hour can often take minutes. What used to create mental clutter can become clear much faster. And that advantage compounds. The entrepreneurs who will dominate the next decade are using AI not as a gimmick, but as a growth tool. They are using it to cut time-to-first-draft, shorten decision cycles, reduce rework, and create more space for high-value thinking. That means more time for strategy, better offers, stronger leadership, and faster execution. They are not letting admin eat their ambition. They are not letting busywork steal their best energy. They are using AI to protect their attention and redirect it toward the work that actually moves the business forward. That is what smart leverage looks like. These entrepreneurs are also obsessed with clarity. They know confusion creates delay. They know scattered attention kills momentum. They know complexity slows everything down. So they use AI to help create cleaner workflows, sharper messaging, better documentation, and faster access to information. They are building businesses that can move with more speed and less chaos.
16 likes • 14d
Agreed. AI is becoming a real leverage multiplier for entrepreneurs who know how to use it well. But I think the next real separator goes beyond speed alone. It’s clarity, discernment, and judgment. The winners won’t just automate more tasks. They’ll build better systems, shorten decision cycles, reduce wasted motion, and protect their best attention for the work only humans should still be doing. That’s where the real edge starts to compound: not just doing more, but building smarter.
1-10 of 55
Kevin Michael Brown
5
247points to level up
@kevin-brown-2649
✨ From Trauma to Transcendence ✨ Through Eterna Works Creative, I craft books, music, and worlds that help humanity remember who we truly are.

Active 10m ago
Joined Nov 1, 2025
North West England & Greece
Powered by