One of our members just shared this (check the image) 👇 Here are the key lessons to take away: - Short copy is no longer optional Gmail is heavily weighting engagement signals. Long emails = skim → ignore → spam signals. Short copy forces clarity and faster replies. - Volume per inbox matters more than total volume 5k/day sounds aggressive, but spread across 750 inboxes = safe. The real danger is overloading individual mailboxes. - Inbox reputation > domain age Reply rate bouncing back to 6% is the real win here. Once replies recover, inbox placement follows. - Consistency beats clever tricks No hacks. No gimmicks. Just disciplined sending, tight copy, and respecting inbox limits. Bottom line: Adjust the system, and deliverability comes back. If you’ve tested similar changes, drop what’s working (or not) below 👇

Hi everyone, just posted a lead magnet about the single prompt that got me 13 potential clients in 1 day. Appreciate any comments and reposts. Thanks! 💪 https://www.linkedin.com/posts/freek-de-bresser_this-one-prompt-got-me-13-potential-clients-activity-7403848245212250112-IEYj?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop&rcm=ACoAADVvFSwBaBEfsQj7-cPp4VHMBBxgxFYBftw

I did a one-time inbox placement test through Instantly and all of them are good, except Microsoft is ~60%. I know you have the automation option, but as you select a campaign for such a test, does this inbox placement auto-testing still work wheter the campaign will be turned off later or does the test only work on life campaigns? And so do the automations always keep working, regardless of which campaign you select to use for the test?

I noticed in my inbox placement tests, it only shows Google. So tested it only selecting Microsoft when setting up a test, but it's still only showing Google. Anyone knows why? Thanks!

Hey guys, q's above ^