Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
What is this?
Less
More

Memberships

Unified Mindfulness

1.3k members • Free

Unified Mindfulness

2.1k members • Free

The Consciousness Path

551 members • Free

28 contributions to The Consciousness Path
Contemplating Intent
On the surface, intent seems to show up in the human social domain relating to potential action, choice and 'free will'. Going deeper, biological life seems to just move and adapt on its own without intent e.g. hair & nails, grow, heart beats, lungs breathe, plants grow etc. Forces of it-not it is interacting, changing living-dying. What is intent? Where does intent arise from? What is the nature of intent? What is it to intend to become conscious? What is it to focus solely on self-survival gratifications? What are the consequences? I'll post a communication if I come up with something. Back in about a week. Interested to hear from others what they come up with 😊 -RD
1 like • 8d
This is rather half-baked, but the main component of intent seems to be whether an action is taken or not. If I did it, I intended to do it. In some way, there was some 'wanting' involved in that act. As a contrast, if I say to myself that I want to do something but don't do it, there wasn't any real intent there. We tend to confuse desiring something with intending to realize it.
Is this Love?
I noticed that when I think about others, I'm only interacting with my thoughts about others. That's how far our relationships go. Yet there is a different way of connecting with others: I notice they are 'in the same place' where I am. It is the same formless seat of our being, unchanged and unlocated. In that seat, we are identical. What follows is an appreciation of this sameness, which I want to call Love. All I can do from that position is simply be That which dreams both of us. So I got curious: is this love? What is love in your experience?
1 like • Mar 12
Hmm, it seems to be relational.
Considerations of integrity
Hey, This is more of a "casual" kind of inquiry, anyone feel free to hop in, I just thought I'd share a real experiential consideration I'm beggining to actually contemplate called integrity. As an experience, what does that look like? Maybe it's easier to look at what NOT integrity is, and use that as a model to better help understand what alternative is, and if it's happening within us. I'd wager, from my own personal perspective, integrity can be described as one part not fighting against another. No disintegration. To become whole. No "split" in consciousness between one aspect and another. But the big thing is, what are REALLY the consequences, of having versus not having integrity? I'd say first off, obviously, is a certain kind of lack of self honesty that can go on. You literally have the one aspect, what your most genuine sense or observation of what is actually going on or true about anything, and if we have a SPLIT in our integrity, then you start to turn away" from that, as if. You literally have a split between "what is true," in your most honest perspective, and "whatever you're trying to do." Your "perceptions" or activities are not aligned with your Most honest perceptions or awareness, as goofy as that sounds. Then obviously, in your life, you lose an ability to be in touch with what you want or what you're trying to do. You know, the whole "I don't know what I want to do with my life" or "lacking motivation" thing. You have on the one hand this idea of something you want to attain, but then on the other you wanna sit on your ass. A spit. There's this misalignment that can come along, a "confused awareness" when a being is less "whole," if that makes sense. If you really want that, why aren't you working for it? Maybe you WANT to sit on your ass but don't admit that to yourself. Or maybe there's a more complex thing happening you need to be more honest with yourself enough to find out. And the big thing, I swear to God, is that this shit is really not moral. Seems more like a "fact" or principle. No a "system," just seems like when things are out of whack or "misaligned," shit is bound to happen.
2 likes • Feb 13
Thanks, will have to look into this. As for the "how," what immediately comes to mind is keeping one's word, however that shows up. It doesn't need to be explicitly stated, it can simply be a promise you implicitly make to yourself. If I "say" to myself that I'm going to do X and then don't follow through, that's a lack of integrity - even if it was said casually. If I keep it, that's keeping integrity. Integrity is a function of keeping one's word. This is a simplistic example but I think it gets the point across.
2 likes • Feb 14
@Devin Henderson I wonder what integrity is without language (or words), since we’ve established a relationship between what we "say" - both to ourselves and to others - and the principle. Your intention is what you “say” and precedes language. Maybe.
Listening as a principle
I was looking at what true listening entails. It seems to me that the more I pay attention, the more evident it becomes that I'm not particularly good at it - not so much in the conventional sense, but in a deeper way. Imagine someone is communicating a profound insight to you - whether it relates to consciousness work, transformation, or something else entirely. What do you do with it? Do you immediately accept it, reject it, believe it, disbelieve it? Do you hear the words, filter them through your mind, recall past references to what's being said, and then conclude that the communication is now understood? Perhaps the first sign of poor listening is this very impulse or predisposition to claim that you've already understood the communication. This seems to be common. We don't realize that we may have failed to listen, that we haven't experienced the insight being shared (or at least not as profoundly as we could have). So how can we better "listen," especially in this context? What even is that about?
2 likes • Feb 7
@Devin Henderson Not sure. Openness could be the underlying principle, with listening being an activity or form through which openness shows up. I'm inclined to say it's interactive, in the sense that it manifests within an interpersonal context. Unless we want to say that "things" somehow communicate with us? For example by way of the feedback we receive from the consequences of our thinking and other actions. Listening might simply mean paying attention in that case, or, as you said, not knowing.
1 like • Feb 7
@Patrick Dinger Thanks. Yes, I sometimes miss that I may not even be willing to listen, even if I adopt the role, gestures, and so on, of a "listener."
1 like • Dec '25
@Brendan Lea A gathering of mimes!
1 like • Dec '25
@Jakub Holý I'd have to agree with that. It seems to apply even if the belief is "accurate" or valid.
1-10 of 28
Diego Arzola
4
87points to level up
@diego-arzola-6631
My bio

Active 2d ago
Joined May 13, 2025
Powered by