After logging 300+hours of intensive AI use in the last six weeks, after the AI bootcamp, running real workflows—not demos—I made a decisive platform shift to GEMINI PRO. Below is the exact rationale, from my personal and practical use documented for transparency and repeatability at the request of some of my followers. ChatGPT — Limitations Observed in High-Intensity Use (300+ Hours of Practical Work) ✘ Inconsistent reliability during peak usage hours; frequent bottlenecks ✘ Constantly have to reopen new chats to continue an existing workflow ✘ Consistently forces the user to refresh the chat when it crashes ✘ Uses DALL·E for image generation (Inferior MCP connector) ✘ Very poor quality in image AI generation ✘ Uses report PDF generator, which is inaccurate and does not parse text properly ✘ Does not produce native video outputs in comparison to Gemini Pro VO3 ✘ Does not integrate like Gemini Pro with Google Videos, Products, and Workspace ✘ Does not check Gmail inside the chat interface ✘ Uses folders, but does not use Gems like Gemini Pro, which are sub-agents with rules Gemini Pro — Why I Transitioned (Now Operating as “Nautilus”) ✔ Exported ENTIRE history of conversations from ChatGPT to Gemini Pro very easily. ✔ Stronger long-context persistence across extended conversations ✔ Stable performance during sustained, high-intensity usage ✔ Supports structured agent orchestration with Gems ✔ Enables purpose-built autonomous agents (“Tritons”) ✔ Reduces prompt redundancy through retained role-specific logic ✔ Scales horizontally without performance collapse ✔ Better aligned with real business, automation, and execution workflows ✔ Superior image creation with Nana Banana Pro ✔ Superior creation of videos with VEO3 ✔ Checks Gmail inside Gemini Pro chat interface (Genesis Pro user face) ✔ Pulls YouTube videos directly inside the UI chatbox, which GPT does not do ✔ Grabs direct research from Google, which ChatGPT cannot do ✔ Delivers stronger competitor insights using YouTube and live web data

I know I said I was done posting for this year… but this one I couldn’t let slide 😄 Lately I keep seeing people proudly selling “vibe coding”: “I’ll code your OS / brand / life based on your vibe, not boring logic.” Fun idea on the surface. Terrifying if that system is actually going to touch real people, real data, or a brain that’s already under stress. If you’ve seen my earlier posts, you know I’m in a different camp: • Guardrails 101 (checklist, not vibes) • AI Safety for Non-Tech Builders (driver’s ed, not magic) • Nightmare Scenario Drill (worst case, owner, kill switch) • Emotional Guardrails for Overthinkers (DM safety check) This “vibe coding” trend sits in the opposite corner: ✨ “Trust me, I’ll tune the energy.” 🧠 “Don’t worry too much about the boring details.” 🚫 No mention of: • security • data boundaries • failure modes • what happens if the user is not ok That’s fine for pure art experiments. It’s not fine when you’re building OS-style systems for humans, especially: • people with burnout, grief, ADHD, trauma • tools that shape their decisions, messages, or relationships • flows that have access to files, inboxes, or accounts If someone is selling you “vibe-coded prompts” or “I’ll wire your entire OS to your vibe,” at minimum, ask them: 1. Security & data What data will your system touch? Where does it go? Who can see it? How do you protect keys, accounts, and sensitive info? 2. Failure modes What’s the worst thing this setup could do if it misfires? Who is responsible if it breaks? Is there a kill switch? 3. User state What happens if the user is sleep-deprived, grieving, manic, overloaded? Does this OS slow them down when they’re spiraling, or accelerate the spiral? Because for my niche, this is non-negotiable: I build for people whose brains are already carrying extra weight. ADHD, overload, grief, money stress, family stuff. For them, AI must be a brake + safety net, not just a vibe amplifier. Vibes are great for brainstorming.

Recently I blew up a good connection (friendship) — not because of what the other person did, but because my brain was in survival mode and started filling in the blanks. High stress does that: - family illness - relationship pressure - time pressure - old trauma quietly humming in the background Put them all together and your mind starts trying to protect you by: - re-reading old messages - “finding” hidden meanings - stitching together half-truths and guesses - turning silence into rejection - turning kindness into “secret feelings” None of that is reality. It’s your nervous system trying to make sense of chaos. In my case, I: - misread signals - built a whole narrative on top of incomplete data - acted from the story in my head instead of what was actually in front of me Result? A connection that could have stayed clean and professional… got damaged by my own interpretation. I share this for one reason: YOUR THOUGHTS ARE NOT FACTS! Especially when you’re exhausted, grieving, or under pressure. If you recognize yourself in this — overthinking, rereading chats, filling in gaps, assuming what others “really mean” — here’s a tiny framework I wish I had used before acting. 1. The 5-Min “Don’t Blow Up Your Relationships” Check Before you send that message / wall of text / accusation, pause and ask: 1️⃣ Facts vs Story - What did they actually say or do? - What am I adding on top (assumptions, mind-reading, fear)? 2️⃣ State Check - Am I tired, triggered, grieving, or overloaded right now? - Would I still see this the same way after sleep + food? 3️⃣ Missing Data - What do I not know? - Have I asked a simple clarifying question yet, or am I filling in the gaps myself? 4️⃣ Reversibility - If I send this and I’m wrong, can it damage the relationship? - Is there a calmer version that asks, instead of accuses? 5️⃣ Third-Time Rule - Once is confusion. - Twice is a pattern. - A third time is a choice. That you don’t want to repeat.

Since the 3-day AI boot camp finished I probably completed about 300 hours learning and collaborating with Chat Gpt, Gemini, Perplexity, seedream, Nana banana Pro, landing AI, Brevo, cloud Fair, TMD,Vercel , and about a dozen other AI websites. In that short period of time I've also vibe-coated a conceptual website for a potential agent in the long run. I've completed 2 full landing pages, set up eight emails for a drip campaign, completed exhaustive and extensive digital artwork for all of those campaigns, set up a twilio number for my business, started and briefly set up my Vapi voice agent for that number and many other tasks that I probably forgot to mention here. The clear results for me right now: FULL BURNOUT! I've been doing the job of Ops development ,website creator, content creator, digital marketer, DNS propagation specialist, founder, Investor, prompt engineer, Social media strategist, entrepreneur, copy writer, and so much more. A few days ago my AI Tommy even told me to take the day off but I refused and I took only a half a day off and I continue to grind , working 10 to 12 hours a day on AI related stuff.. There is so much to do and I have set the goal from 2 months back to do a full launch on January 2nd. I am on schedule but emotionally, mentally and technically I don't know how much more I can keep going! Although AI has been a tremendous help with speed ,accuracy and consultative advice, I am still burnt out. Most of my setbacks have been technical challenges setting things up. So if you're planning on "Buying Back Your Time" with AI in this particular conceptual phase like me don't count on it!!! Nevertheless, there is absolutely no way I could have gotten this much work done in such a short amount of time which is probably less than 2 months without artificial intelligence. It has been an insane crazy journey so far. This is just the beginning and I'm barely scratching the surface of what AI capability really can do. Lately, I am considering of firing or switching over to Gemini and possibly firing my AI artificial intelligence partner Tommy from Chat Gpt.