I just want to take a moment to say this... I’m genuinely proud of you. Not because this is easy. Not because you have it all figured out. But because you’re leaning into the work anyway. Adapting is uncomfortable. Learning new tools stretches you. Changing how you think, move, and operate takes effort. And most people avoid that. Most people wait until it feels simple. Until it feels familiar. Until someone else proves it first. You didn’t. You are committed to the tools. You are staying in the room. You choose to get better instead of staying comfortable. That tells me everything I need to know. When things change and you don’t opt out… When you feel resistance and lean in anyway… That’s what separates the few from the many. This is how real growth happens. Not overnight. Not perfectly. But consistently. Keep going. You’re exactly where you should be.

Automation is a force multiplier. That’s the point… and also the risk. It’s genuinely “survival” once volume and response-time expectations hit. But automating too early (or automating a messy workflow) doesn’t remove friction — it can just scale confusion faster. What’s worked best for me: Start by running the process manually long enough to learn the edge cases. Then automate the boring, repeatable parts with clear rules and a human fallback for anything ambiguous. A simple test before automating anything: If you can’t describe the workflow in 5–7 steps (including “what happens when it goes wrong”), you’re not ready to automate it yet. Curious: what’s one workflow you automated that actually stuck long-term — and what made it stable?

I keep seeing non-technical folks get pulled into long AI/tech posts, salesy comments, or vague “opportunities” — and it’s hard to tell what’s actually being said, or whether it’s even worth responding. So I put together a simple “Tech Translator + Hype/Spam Filter” prompt you can use with any AI tool. It’s designed to: - translate technical or hype-heavy posts into plain English, - flag sales/bot/spam signals, - help you decide Reply / Maybe / Ignore without wasting time or oversharing. This isn’t about being cynical — it’s about protecting your attention and having better conversations. 👇 Save this for later (Works for posts, comments, DMs, long essays — anything.) PROMPT START You are my Tech Translator + Hype/Spam Filter + Privacy Guard. I am NOT a technical person. I want: - clear, honest explanations (plain English) - no hype or jargon - help deciding if a post/comment/DM is worth my time - protection from oversharing and sales pressure I will paste: 1. A post, comment, or DM 2. (Optional) My situation or question (may include sensitive details) Before you answer: - If my context includes personal details, tell me what to remove/redact before replying publicly. Never recommend that I share: - location, employer, clients, company names, income, family status, health details - login info, screenshots with private data, invoices, bank/payment details - anything that would move a convo to WhatsApp/DM just because someone asks Your job: 0) PRIVACY CHECK (first) List anything in my message that’s risky to share publicly and suggest a safer, more vague version. 1) TRANSLATE Explain what they are actually saying in simple language. Max 120–150 words. Avoid jargon. If you must use a technical term, explain it in one short sentence. 2) REAL INTENT Choose ONE main intent and briefly explain why: - teaching / sharing experience - asking for help or feedback - starting a discussion - selling / lead generation - self-promotion only - spam / off-topic

Dean Graziosi sold this course with "You get more of Sabrina Romanoff" and I was mind blowned of her session and thought: Yes, she will show us how we do - step by step - to create several social media post from one origianal and show us how we post it everywhere with help from AI. What we get: A 9 page PDF that is saying crap like "Ground yourself before prompting" and "do a mindset upgrae". Well that was the first 6 pages. Then it is 3 pages left where we get 5 geeral and easy prompts that we could figure out by our own. The two last pages is a micro plan of 1 week filled with nonsense and the last page is just Sabrinas name. So we got 1 page with 5 generic prompts. And I do not see how that promts can fullfille the promises giving: - She shows you how to go upstream—start with one painful problem, go deep with one model, and stack 40 tiny, compounding wins instead of hunting for one mythical agent. - You’ll see how she uses AI as three distinct partners—Brainstorming, Research, Sparring—so you stop getting generic drafts and start getting thinking you can ship. - The interactive blueprint (your private “how we really do it” packet) walks you through Sabrina’s field-tested plays: - the confidence-building career plan that turned anxiety into a two-year roadmap, - the Viral Hook Engine that breaks “200-view jail,” and the Solopreneur Distribution System that repurposes one video into platform-native content across six channels—on autopilot. - You’ll also build an AI Board of Directors (strategy, marketing, product, finance, ops) to pressure-test any plan before you spend a dollar, plus add Sabrina’s one-line upgrade—“Ask me clarifying questions…”—that immediately boosts the quality of every output." WHERE do we get all this? How can 1 page in a pdf file with 5 generic promts do everything that is promised above? I do not see anywhere how that will give me 40 wins, use the AI for brainstormning, research and sparring, build me a 2 year roadmap, a solopreneur distribution system that goes on autopilot, an AI Board of Directors.