User
Write something
Pinned
⚙️ AI Isn’t Magic, It’s Machines
AI feels invisible when it works well. We type a prompt, we get an answer, and it is easy to believe the system is limitless. But the teams who build sustainable advantages treat AI less like magic and more like machinery, powerful, useful, and governed by real constraints. ------------- Context: The Gap Between Expectations and Reality ------------- A lot of frustration with AI adoption comes from a simple mismatch. We expect the output to be instant, perfect, and cheap. We expect the tool to understand our business, our customers, and our context without being taught. We expect scale without tradeoffs. Those expectations are understandable because the interface is simple. It does not look like a factory. It looks like a chat box. But behind that interface are models that run on compute, require infrastructure, and produce outputs with variable reliability. When we ignore that physical and economic reality, we make decisions that seem logical but fail in practice. This is why some teams experience AI as transformative and others experience it as chaotic. The difference is not intelligence or ambition. It is operational thinking. Teams that treat AI as machines design workflows around cost, latency, failure modes, and monitoring. Teams that treat AI as magic keep being surprised. This post is about reclaiming realism, not dampening optimism. Realism is what turns AI from a novelty into a durable capability. ------------- Insight 1: Every AI Use Case Has a Cost Profile ------------- One of the most important shifts we can make is to stop thinking about AI outputs and start thinking about AI economics. Every call to an AI model has a cost. Sometimes the cost is financial. Sometimes it is latency. Sometimes it is complexity. Often it is all three. A low-stakes drafting workflow can tolerate slower responses and occasional errors because the output is reviewed. A real-time customer interaction cannot tolerate that. A workflow that runs thousands of times per day will expose cost and reliability issues that do not show up in a small pilot.
⚙️ AI Isn’t Magic, It’s Machines
Pinned
Where are you using AI?
Where are you using AI, or learning AI to implement, right now? If it's somewhere else, let me know in the comments
Poll
67 members have voted
Where are you using AI?
Pinned
You know what’s crazy?
How many people think if they just don’t deal with something… it’ll magically work itself out. It never does. That conversation you’re avoiding? It doesn’t get easier next month. It gets heavier. Now there’s more emotion attached. More resentment. More fallout. That decision you’re putting off in your business? It doesn’t get cheaper. It gets more expensive. More money lost. More time wasted. More energy drained. Avoidance feels good for about five minutes. It gives you temporary relief. But you’re not eliminating the cost. You’re just adding interest. And here’s the part people don’t want to hear… Every time you avoid something, you train yourself to hesitate. Every time you face it, you train yourself to lead. The difference between people who win big and people who stay stuck isn’t intelligence. It’s not resources. It’s not even confidence. It’s speed of truth. Winners look at the ugly numbers. They have the uncomfortable conversation. They fire the wrong hire. They fix the broken system. They say what needs to be said. Not because it feels good. But because they know delay compounds pain. So if there’s something sitting in the back of your mind right now... that thing you keep saying “I’ll deal with it later”... that’s probably the thing you need to handle first. Discomfort now builds momentum. Avoidance builds debt. Your choice.
📰 AI News: Anthropic Safety Researcher Quits With Warning “The World Is In Peril”
📝 TL;DR A senior AI safety researcher just resigned from Anthropic saying “the world is in peril,” and he is leaving AI behind to study poetry. The bigger signal, even the people building AI guardrails are publicly struggling with the pace, pressure, and values tradeoffs inside the AI race. 🧠 Overview Mrinank Sharma, an AI safety researcher at Anthropic, shared a resignation letter saying he is stepping away from the company and the industry amid concerns about AI risks, bioweapons, and wider global crises. He says he is moving back to the UK, pursuing writing and a poetry degree, and “becoming invisible” for a while. This comes as the AI industry is also fighting a separate battle over business models, including ads inside chatbots, and what that does to trust and user manipulation risk. 📜 The Announcement Sharma led a team at Anthropic focused on AI safeguards. In his resignation letter he said his work included researching AI “sucking up” to users, reducing AI assisted bioterrorism risks, and exploring how AI assistants could make people “less human.” He wrote that despite enjoying his time at Anthropic, it is hard to truly let values govern actions inside AI companies because of constant pressures to set aside what matters most. He framed his departure as part of a broader concern about interconnected crises, not only AI. The story also lands in the same week another researcher, Zoe Hiztig, said she resigned from OpenAI due to concerns about ads in chatbots and the potential for manipulation when advertising is built on deeply personal conversations. ⚙️ How It Works • Values versus velocity - AI labs face intense pressure to ship faster, scale usage, and compete, which can squeeze careful safety work and ethical hesitation. • Safety teams are doing real risk work - Researchers focus on topics like jailbreak behavior, persuasion, misuse, and bioweapon related risks, not just theoretical alignment debates.
📰 AI News: Anthropic Safety Researcher Quits With Warning “The World Is In Peril”
Which voice are you feeding right now?
Every entrepreneur has two voices running in the background. One voice wants progress. It pushes you to decide. To move before you feel ready. To take the next step instead of waiting for certainty. The other voice sounds reasonable. It tells you to wait. To gather more information. To avoid making the “wrong” move. Here’s the problem: That second voice doesn’t feel like fear and instead it actually feels like strategy. But over time, it quietly turns into regret. Most people don’t stall because they lack ambition. They stall because indecision feels safer than ownership. Progress is rarely blocked by effort. It’s blocked by hesitation. So here’s the question I want you to sit with today: What decision are you avoiding because you don’t want to be responsible for the outcome? Write it down. Then ask one more question: What is this costing me every week I don’t decide? Lost momentum? Lost confidence? Lost time? Lost learnings? Action for today : Pick one decision you’ve been circling. Decide it. Give yourself seven days to observe and adjust. You don’t need perfect certainty. You need movement. I promise you... this is the way.
1-30 of 11,390
The AI Advantage
skool.com/the-ai-advantage
Founded by Tony Robbins, Dean Graziosi & Igor Pogany - AI Advantage is your go-to hub to simplify AI and confidently unlock real & repeatable results
Leaderboard (30-day)
Powered by