⚡ Why Your "Productivity" AI Strategy Is Actually Making You Slower

We need to talk about something uncomfortable.

A lot of people in this community are using AI wrong. Not because they don't understand the tools. But because they're optimizing for the wrong thing.

Here's what we're seeing:

Someone discovers AI can write emails faster. So they start using it for every email. Then every message. Then every piece of communication. They're producing more content than ever. But here's the question nobody asks: is more actually better?

The uncomfortable truth:

Just because you can generate something in 30 seconds doesn't mean you should. AI is making it easier than ever to create noise. The real skill isn't using AI to do more. It's using AI to think better about what's worth doing at all.

Examples:

Mike runs a consulting practice and was thrilled when he started using AI to respond to every inquiry within minutes. His response time was incredible. But his close rate dropped. Why? Because the fast responses were generic. Prospects could tell. He was optimizing for speed when he should have been optimizing for relevance. Now he uses AI differently: to research the prospect and draft a thoughtful response he then personalizes. Takes longer. Converts better.

Jennifer manages a team and started using AI to create detailed meeting agendas, follow-up emails, and status updates for everything. Her team was drowning in communication. She thought she was being thorough. Really, she was creating work. Now she asks first: "Does this meeting need to happen?" and "Would a 2-sentence Slack message work instead?" AI helps her communicate when she needs to, not just because she can.

David creates content for tech startups and was publishing 3x more blog posts after adopting AI. Traffic went up slightly. Engagement tanked. Readers could tell something was off. The posts were fine but forgettable. He was cranking out volume when his audience wanted depth. Now he uses AI for research and first drafts, but he spends the saved time making fewer posts significantly better. Traffic is growing again because people actually share the content.

The pattern we keep seeing:

People use AI to do more of what they were already doing. More emails. More posts. More content. More documents. They mistake activity for progress.

The businesses actually transforming aren't doing more. They're doing less, better, faster.

What changes when you flip the script:

Instead of asking "What can AI help me create?" ask "What should I stop creating?"

Instead of "How can I respond faster?" ask "Which conversations actually matter?"

Instead of "How do I produce more content?" ask "What would make this content worth someone's time?"

Here's the real power move:

Use AI to handle the stuff that doesn't need your brain so you can focus on the stuff that does. Not so you can cram more tasks into the same day.

Examples of this in action:

→ Sarah, freelance designer: Stopped using AI to generate more client proposals. Started using it to automate intake forms, project briefs, and status updates so she could spend that time on actual design work. Her output per week went down. Her income went up because the work was better.

→ Marcus, real estate agent: Stopped using AI to create more listing descriptions. Started using it to analyze market data and identify which properties to focus on. He lists fewer homes now but they sell faster because he's more selective about what he takes on.

→ Lisa, course creator: Stopped using AI to produce more content modules. Started using it to analyze student questions and identify exactly where people get stuck. Her courses are shorter now but completion rates doubled because she cut the fluff.

The uncomfortable question:

How much of what you're creating is actually valuable versus just easy to produce now that AI exists?

We're drowning in AI-generated content. Email inboxes are fuller. LinkedIn is noisier. Everyone's publishing more. But attention hasn't increased. If anything, people are more selective about what they engage with because they're overwhelmed.

The counterintuitive move:

Use AI to buy back your time, then use that time to think. To go deeper. To be more intentional about what you create and who you create it for.

The competitive advantage isn't speed anymore. Everyone has access to speed. The advantage is judgment. Knowing what's worth creating. Knowing when less is more. Knowing the difference between being busy and being effective.

What this actually looks like:

Before AI: Spend 2 hours writing 1 thoughtful client proposal.

With AI (wrong way): Spend 2 hours writing 8 generic proposals.

With AI (right way): Spend 20 minutes on the proposal draft, 1 hour 40 minutes researching the client so the proposal actually resonates.

Before AI: Spend 3 hours creating 1 blog post.

With AI (wrong way): Spend 3 hours creating 5 mediocre posts.

With AI (right way): Spend 1 hour on the first draft, 2 hours making it genuinely insightful so people actually read and share it.

The shift:

We've been conditioned to think productivity means doing more. AI makes "more" so easy that we've stopped questioning whether "more" is the goal.

But your clients don't want more emails. Your audience doesn't want more content. Your team doesn't want more meetings. They want the right thing, done well, at the right time.

Here's the challenge:

This week, track everything you're using AI to create. Then ask: "Would this still be worth creating if it took me 10x longer?" If the answer is no, stop creating it. Use AI to eliminate the noise, not amplify it.

The people winning with AI aren't the ones producing the most. They're the ones producing what matters and cutting everything else.

Your turn:

What's one thing you've been using AI to do more of that you should probably be doing less of? Let's get honest about it below.

8 comments