📰 AI News: Documentary Streamer CuriosityStream Bets Its Future on AI Training Data

🔥

Nov '25 • AI News

CuriosityStream, the documentary streaming service, just revealed it expects to make most of its revenue from licensing content to AI companies by 2027, not from subscriptions. This marks one of the most dramatic business model pivots we've seen in the streaming wars, and it reveals where real money is flowing in the AI economy.

The announcement:

CuriosityStream CEO Clint Stinchcomb announced that licensing revenue will surpass subscription revenue by 2027, possibly earlier. The company has already signed deals with eight leading AI developers including partnerships for Google Gemini, delivering 1.8 million hours of ethically sourced documentary content for AI training. In Q3 2025, this strategy drove revenue up 46% to $18.4 million while cutting losses to under $4 million.

The company isn't just licensing its own 300,000 hours of content. It's brokering deals for an additional 1.7 million hours from third-party content owners, taking 50% of the AI licensing revenue in exchange for access to its established relationships with AI companies.

What's being built:

CuriosityStream has upgraded its technical infrastructure to deliver content at speeds up to 300 Gbps, enabling large-scale data transfers to AI companies. The company completed 18 distinct content fulfillments across video, audio, and code assets, positioning itself as a preferred provider of high-quality training data for AI systems.

The streaming service plans to double its content library in 2026 and expects to double or triple its number of AI licensing partners during the same period. As more open-source models become accessible, CuriosityStream anticipates hundreds or even thousands of companies will need video content to fine-tune specific models.

Why this matters:

🎯 The business model is flipping: A company built to sell subscriptions to consumers is now making more money selling data to AI companies. This isn't a side hustle, it's becoming the core business. That signals where the real value lies in content ownership.

💰 Content suddenly has new buyers: Every media company is scrambling for streaming subscribers in a saturated market. CuriosityStream found a completely different customer base willing to pay for the same content. AI companies need training data more than consumers need another streaming service.

🌍 Documentary content has unique advantages: CuriosityStream's CEO points out they don't deal with actors, guilds, or complex rights issues that plague scripted content. Their fact-based documentaries are ethically sourced, already organized with detailed metadata, and perfect for training AI on reliable information instead of fiction.

⚡ Wall Street is paying attention: Needham analyst Laura Martin told industry leaders that "everyone who controls first-party data should be generating revenue from large language models. If you don't own first-party data, you will go out of business." She gives companies a 50% markup on valuation for every new revenue stream they add.

🔮 First-mover advantage compounds: CuriosityStream struck its first AI deal over a year ago when competitors were still focused entirely on streaming. That head start means established relationships, technical infrastructure, and expertise that will be hard for others to match.

What this means for businesses:

🚀 IP you own just became more valuable: If you've created original content, courses, videos, documentation, or datasets, there's potentially a new buyer you haven't considered. AI companies need training data and they're willing to pay for quality, ethically sourced material.

💼 The content licensing playbook changed: Traditional content licensing meant selling to other streaming services or broadcasters. Now there's a parallel market in AI training that could be more lucrative and doesn't cannibalize your core audience.

📊 Metadata and organization matter: CuriosityStream's advantage isn't just owning content, it's having content that's already structured, tagged, and organized. If you own IP, investing in proper metadata could unlock AI licensing opportunities.

⚖️ Rights clarity is everything: CuriosityStream emphasizes they own 100% of the IP rights or have clear agreements with rights holders. If your content has murky ownership or complex rights issues, you can't play in this space. Clean IP rights just became significantly more valuable.

🛡️ Ethical sourcing matters to buyers: AI companies want training data that won't create legal problems or public backlash. Content that's ethically sourced, fact-based, and clearly licensed has premium value compared to scraped internet data.

💡 Partnership models emerge: CuriosityStream isn't just licensing its own content. Third-party content owners can "step into" existing deals, sharing 50% of revenue in exchange for access to established AI partnerships. If you have quality IP but no AI relationships, intermediaries like this could be your path to market.

The bottom line:

CuriosityStream's pivot reveals a fundamental shift in content economics. After losing $51 million in 2022, the company is now on track to profitability, not by winning the streaming wars but by opting out entirely and selling to a different customer: AI developers.

This matters because CuriosityStream isn't unique in owning content. Thousands of businesses have video libraries, training materials, courses, or documentation collecting digital dust. What changed is AI companies now need that content desperately and have budgets to match.

The question for any business with original content: are you sitting on an asset you're not monetizing? Course creators, training companies, media producers, and anyone with substantial original video, audio, or text content should be asking if there's an AI licensing play.

What makes this particularly interesting is the timeline. CuriosityStream expects licensing to exceed subscription revenue by 2027. That's 18 months away. This isn't a distant future trend, it's happening now. The companies moving first are establishing relationships and infrastructure that will be difficult for latecomers to replicate.

For businesses watching this space, the strategic question is whether you have IP worth licensing and whether you're positioned to move quickly enough to capture this opportunity before the market matures.

Your take: If you own original content, would you consider licensing it for AI training, or do the ethics feel too murky? 🤔

5 comments