Is anti-fragility still necessary to be successful?

𝐏𝐢𝐜𝐤 𝐎𝐧𝐞 𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐦𝐩𝐭 𝐭𝐨 𝐀𝐧𝐬𝐰𝐞𝐫

A lot of leadership advice assumes stability, clear plans, steady execution, predictable inputs. But March has been a good reminder that the world doesn’t really care about our plans.

So I want to put a simple question to the group:

Is anti-fragility still necessary to be successful, or is it optional?

If you think it’s necessary, say why.

If you think it’s not, tell us what replaces it.

Where did volatility show up for you in the last 10 days, and did you get stronger, stay steady, or take a hit?
What part of your leadership or business is most fragile right now (the smallest disruption causes the biggest damage)?
Where are you playing it “safe” but actually sitting in the dangerous middle, too much downside, not enough upside?
What’s one thing you could remove this month that would make you more resilient immediately (a commitment, dependency, or complexity)?

4 comments

Is anti-fragility still necessary to be successful?