This has been forwarded to me and in case it's useful for some, here it is: Your employer isn't a debt collector. Send them this and follow through if they don't cease.. [Your Name] [Your Address] [City, Postcode] [Date] To: [Employer's Name / HR Department] [Company Name] [Company Address] Subject: Formal Notice – Unlawful Wage Deductions for Alleged Council Tax Arrears Dear [Employer's Name], I write to formally put you on notice that any deductions from my wages relating to alleged council tax arrears claimed by [Council Name] are unlawful unless and until the council provides clear and lawful evidence of their entitlement to enforce such deductions. Legal Framework Governing Wage Deductions 1. The Requirement for a Legally Executed Liability Order In Leighton v Bristow and Sutor [2023], the High Court reaffirmed that enforcement actions, including wage deductions, cannot proceed without a valid and properly executed Liability Order issued by a Magistrates’ Court. Such an order must: • Be properly executed, bearing the court’s official seal and the signature of an authorized officer; and • Clearly specify the liability in question. Without a valid Liability Order meeting these statutory requirements, any attempt to enforce the alleged debt is rendered unlawful under the Council Tax (Administration and Enforcement) Regulations 1992. 2. Employer Obligations Regarding Wage Deductions Under the Employment Rights Act 1996 (Section 13), deductions from an employee’s wages are only lawful if: • Required by statute; or • Made with the express consent of the employee. In this case, the statutory basis for deductions hinges entirely upon the existence of a valid Liability Order. Without such an order, deductions are unlawful, as established in Southfield v British Telecommunications plc [1998] IRLR 18. Employers must also act reasonably to verify the lawfulness of deductions. As stated in Cambridge and County Developments (Contractors) Ltd v Hughes [1973] QB 522, an employer is under a duty to investigate the validity of any purported statutory authority before acting on it.

I name a living woman, English National and indigenous am writing for you to recognise I cannot respect persons. I will be communicating to you as a private living woman. I a Watchman,- I have a duty and obligation to warn you. To those that maybe having intent to harm or bring harm to others. Under your own law to obey it lest you put yourself into a damaged position. Ezekiel 33 in the 1611 King James Version (KJV) details God appointing Ezekiel as a watchman for Israel, responsible for warning the wicked to turn from their ways and live. As my faith unincorporated I cannot be discriminated against forced or intimidated to use statutes codes or regulations. That have been added to and taken away from God's law.

This is for Moors , Christian Muslims and Jews also. Treaties are suppose to be law of the land

I know it's a Monday, but this is a special opportunity to question a guy using the powerful process of Equity at Law, to compel the system to drop charges or discharge debts, including Mortgages! Bring your questions and projects for Andrew to give some ideas. www.freedomwithequity.com Zoom Link

A “Statute’ is not a Law,” (Flournoy v. First Nat. Bank of Shreveport, 197 La. 1067, 3 So.2d 244, 248), A “Code’ is not a Law,” (In Re Self v Rhay Wn 2d 261), in point of fact in Law,) A concurrent or ‘joint resolution’of legislature is not “Law,” (Koenig v. Flynn, 258 N.Y. 292, 179 N. E. 705, 707; Ward v State, 176 Okl. 368, 56 P.2d 136, 137; State ex rel. Todd v. Yelle, 7 Wash.2d 443, 110 P.2d 162, 165). All codes, rules, and regulations are for government authorities only, not human/Creators in accord with God’s Laws. “All codes, rules, and regulations are unconstitutional and lacking due process of Law..” - (Rodriques v. Ray Donavan, U.S. Department of Labor, 769 F.2d 1344, 1348 (1985)); ". Copied and pasted from my FB news feed shared by Dave Emoven