What topics do you suggest we discuss in our next group discussion?

Here is the recording of our latest session. True hatred is often just jealousy wearing a mask of righteousness. In our latest session, the room dissected the architecture of modern bigotry. The consensus was stark. Antisemitism is a pathology of the mind. It is a conspiracy theory that views the Jew as a shapeshifter. To the communist, he is the capitalist. To the nationalist, he is the globalist. The hatred stems from a delusion of "punching up" against a secret overlord. It is a virus that infects societies looking for a scapegoat to blame for their own failures. We contrasted this with the so-called "Islamophobia." The group argued this is not a phobia at all. A phobia is an irrational fear. The fear of political Islam is derived from reading its own operating manual. It is a rational reaction to a competing world order that explicitly seeks domination. One speaker noted that Judaism is an ethno-religion content to exist within the current structure. It does not seek to convert you or burn down the state to build a temple. Islam does. The discussion did not let the West off the hook. We acknowledged that for centuries, the Cross was just as dangerous to the Jew as the Crescent. But the room concluded that the modern West faces only one active, expansionist threat today. One is a ghost story about "Zionist control." The other is a geopolitical reality. Most political spaces are echo chambers of hysteria. Our sessions act as a filter for noise to separate irrational hatred from necessary vigilance. Step into a room where ideas are dissected with surgical precision rather than emotional outbursts. View the calendar at this link to join our next discussion: https://www.skool.com/libertypolitics/calendar

Can men wear pantyhose

Here is the recording of our latest session. In our latest daily session, the discussion moved beyond the lazy slurs of mainstream political discourse to conduct a forensic audit of the "America First" ethno-nationalist argument. We analyzed the rhetoric of figures like Nick Fuentes and the growing "Dissident Right" to answer a fundamental question: Is Western civilization a product of European genetics, or is it a set of operating principles that can be run by anyone? The room refused to settle for moral outrage. Calling an opponent "racist" is a tactical failure that convinces no one. Instead, the group steel-manned the opposition. We confronted the arguments regarding IQ distributions, high-trust societies, and the undeniable friction caused by mass, unregulated migration. We examined the claim that culture is strictly downstream of race. However, the collective intelligence pivoted to a more devastating critique. The ethno-state is simply a bad business model. The discussion highlighted that true nationalism is not about isolation or racial purity. It is about cognitive resource extraction. The greatest strategic advantage of the American experiment was its ability to poach the highest-IQ individuals from every other nation on earth. The debate revealed a critical paradox: if you filter strictly by ethnicity rather than merit, you are actively choosing stagnation. You are leaving the "good ones" to build the economies of your rivals. We concluded that the "White Identity" argument is not a defense of the West. It is a rejection of the specific meritocratic machinery that made the West dominant. The ethno-statist does not want to compete. He wants a handicap. We do not fear dangerous ideas; we dismantle them with logic and history. If you are tired of echo chambers and want to test your worldview against a room of sharp, disagreeable minds, take your seat at the table. View the calendar at this link to join our next discussion: https://www.skool.com/libertypolitics/calendar