Here is the recording of our latest session. In our latest daily session, the group dissected a terrifying survival strategy potentially brewing within the Iranian regime. We called it the "Third Republic" scenario. The consensus in the room was that the IRGC is not stupid. They see the writing on the wall. The "Second Republic" of Khamenei is dying. To survive, the military elite may be preparing to sacrifice the clerics to save the conglomerate. The regime’s plan is to offer the people "cheap liberties." They will likely stop enforcing the hijab. They might allow concerts. They will let the youth drink and party. They will give you the social freedoms that make you feel like the revolution has succeeded. But this is a bribe. While the people are distracted by this newfound social looseness, the IRGC will maintain its iron grip on the economy and the military. They will remain the sole owners of the nation’s wealth. You will be free to wear what you want, but you will remain poor. You will be free to dance, but you will still breathe polluted air and suffer electricity outages because the infrastructure remains in the hands of a corrupt mafia. This is the trap of the "Third Republic." It is a cosmetic surgery on a cancer patient. The group concluded that this is the ultimate deception. True liberty is not just about lifestyle. It is about economic sovereignty. If the Guard keeps the money, the revolution has failed. This is the level of political forecasting we engage in daily. We don't just react to the news; we dissect the survival strategies of failing regimes and anticipate their next move. If you are tired of surface-level commentary and want to understand the mechanics of power, you belong in this room. View the calendar at this link to join our next discussion: https://www.skool.com/libertypolitics/calendar

Here is the recording of our latest session. In our latest daily session, the room returned again and again to the same anomaly: the regime is not behaving the way it always has. Streets are not fully emptied. The internet is not comprehensively cut. Riot forces retreat from crowds throwing stones. This is not the pattern Iranians have learned to expect. That absence of brutality is the signal under examination. One part of the discussion leaned toward cautious optimism. The argument was simple and grounded in precedent. Every previous uprising reached this level and was met with overwhelming violence. This time, that violence is missing. If the regime were confident, it would already have crushed the streets. Its hesitation suggests internal decay, fear of escalation, and a shrinking willingness among foot soldiers to risk their lives for a collapsing system. Another part of the room refused to relax. Silence, they argued, is not neutrality. It can be preparation. It can be consolidation. It can be the pause before a coordinated strike. Revolutions fail when people mistake a tactical delay for surrender. The Islamic Republic has survived for decades by adapting, infiltrating, and exploiting moments of emotional overconfidence. The friction between these views mattered. Nobody pretended certainty. The disagreement was about posture, not loyalty. One side stressed momentum and morale. The other stressed operational discipline and worst case planning. Both were shaped by the same historical memory: 1979 did not fail because the streets lacked courage, it failed because power vacuums invite predators. What the room converged on was not prediction, but posture. Treat the regime as wounded, not dead. Act as if every lull could be reversed. Do not confuse absence of gunfire with absence of intent. Optimism without skepticism has killed more revolutions than fear ever has. The silence may be the sound of collapse. Or it may be the sound of a system deciding when to strike. Until proven otherwise, the only rational position is to assume it could be both.

Here is the recording of our latest session. A law without the capacity for enforcement is nothing more than a polite suggestion. In our latest daily session, the group dissected the sudden removal of the Venezuelan dictator and found the concept of "International Law" wanting. The discussion opened with a fracture. A few voices raised the shield of principle. They questioned if violating sovereignty, even against a tyrant, erodes the moral standing of the West. They asked if the ends truly justify the means or if we are simply engaging in the same power games as our adversaries. But the room quickly pivoted to the cold mechanics of reality. The dominant view was that "International Law" is a luxury product subsidized entirely by American firepower. As the collective noted, the United Nations writes resolutions, but the United States Navy enforces reality. If the hegemon does not benefit from the order it maintains, that order collapses. We concluded that the world does not run on parchment or treaties. It runs on leverage, logistics, and the willingness to project force. The extraction of Maduro was not a violation of the rules. It was a reminder of who actually writes them. We do not deal in pleasantries or diplomatic fictions. If you are tired of the sanitized narratives presented by mainstream outlets and wish to engage with the raw machinery of geopolitics, this is your arena. Join us as we dissect the world as it is, not as we wish it to be. View the calendar at this link to join our next discussion: https://www.skool.com/libertypolitics/calendar

Here is the recording of our latest session. Totalitarian regimes do not die in a blaze of glory. They die in a cold sweat. They die when the executioner realizes he is the one being hunted. In our latest daily session, the group analyzed the psychological disintegration of the Iranian regime. We moved past the headlines to the mechanics of terror. The conclusion was stark. The Islamic Republic is no longer projecting power. It is hiding from its own shadow. The room highlighted a terrifying shift in the dynamic of control. We discussed reports of intelligence agencies contacting IRGC commanders directly on their personal phones. The ultimatum is simple. "We know where you sleep. Defect or face the consequences." This is not traditional warfare. It is the systematic dismantling of a mafia state using its own tactics. Members noted that this specific brand of fear has paralyzed the leadership. Commanders are terrified to gather in groups. They are suspicious of their own electronics. One member pointed out the grim irony of a brutal general afraid to touch his own remote control. When the leadership is this rattled, the chain of command dissolves. There was friction in the room regarding the final blow. Some argued for patience to let the internal collapse run its course. Others argued that surgical strikes are necessary right now to break the stalemate. But the consensus was clear. The riot police are now the ones afraid of being identified. The hunter has become the prey. There is a difference between consuming news and analyzing intelligence. In this community, we do not spectate; we scrutinize every fracture in the geopolitical landscape. Access the kind of unfiltered, high-level discourse that others are too afraid to broadcast. View the calendar at this link to join our next discussion: https://www.skool.com/libertypolitics/calendar