It's crazy to think about the fact that most of the world grew up with the Christian/Zoroastrian idea of the dualistic devil. To think about the consequences of that dualistic belief is difficult, but here's what I see: When you believe in two opposing cosmic forces battling it out, you externalize evil. "The devil convinced me to do it". Evil becomes something out there attacking you, not something you're responsible for navigating. And when hardship comes, there's no meaning to find. It's just bad. The enemy won this round. No lesson, no growth. Just senseless suffering. This makes everything more extreme, more hopeless. You're not being shaped, you're being attacked. Add cheap grace on top. Sin, confess to Jesus, repeat tomorrow. Where's the pressure to actually become better? But in a monotheistic beleife, hardship becomes something else entirely. A loving father educating his son. An act of love. Painful, yes. But it propels you forward. It refines you. It means something. Dualism robs people of that. It leaves them swimming in darkness instead of growing through it. What do you guys think, did I get it right? (A photo of the persian devil below)

Here is the recording of our latest session. The most efficient survival mechanism for a tyranny is not brutality. It is rebranding. When the structure begins to rot, the most dangerous operators do not flee. They simply change their uniforms and offer to manage the transition for the highest bidder. In our latest daily session, the group dissected the cynical geopolitical theater currently playing out between Venezuela and Iran. The discussion stripped away the optimistic headlines to reveal a darker reality. We are witnessing a high-stakes confidence game where the prize is the continuity of the Islamic Republic under a new, palatable mask. The recent dismissal of Machado serves as a stark warning. Western powers prefer a stabilized status quo over chaotic freedom. A compliant operator who keeps the oil flowing is always preferable to a nationalist who puts their country first. This lens was then applied to the streets of Tehran. The room uncovered a counter-intuitive threat. The hardliners are no longer the primary danger. They are visible. They are hated. The true danger lies with the "Reformists." This faction is currently signaling to the West that they are the adults in the room. They are effectively willing to offer up Khamenei as a sacrificial lamb. They will trade the Supreme Leader to save the system. The discussion analyzed the power vacuum left by the recent "12-Day War" and the surgical removal of key IRGC commanders. That void is being filled by these political chameleons. They are betting that the West, fearful of a total collapse or a repetition of the Iraqi power vacuum, will accept a "Reformist" government. This outcome would keep the IRGC machinery intact but hidden behind a smile. There was significant friction in the room regarding foreign intervention. The natural instinct is to call for American support. However, if the revolution is all American-made, the outcome belongs to America and ends with a deal that suits Washington. That deal is likely a compromise with these very Reformists. For Iran to be truly free, the revolution must be Iranian. The people must own the street so they can own the negotiation table.

Donald Trump sends chilling warning to Iran over the government's attacks on protesters Trump has made some new comments on how he has acknowledged there are people being murdered in Iran by the evil Islamic Extremists there. Personally I think he -- Trump -- should have gone in straight away... What does everyone else think?

https://youtu.be/1swPGLfi2_8?si=G12v1NF7t_XUWa43 This is about how socialism destroyed the country. He talks about how a murderous dictating narco terrorist named Maduro took it over. He talks about how socialist governments have failed in general and how rich his country of Venezuela was before socialism. EDIT: "Part 2" Live Venezuela Update with Francis Foster and Konstantin Kisin