24h • General Discussion
Candy vs. Andy
This was arguably the most important debate of the year. Between the camp that wishes to divide and destroy our Liberty Movement and the camp that wishes to unify it and drive our cause to success.
The burden of proof in this battle rests on Candace in all her following claims that overturn the established assassination case:
1. That Charlie Kirk was not shot by Tyler Robinson and his rifle
2. That Kirk was killed by an "exploding microphone" rather than a bullet
3. That Kirk's former security chief helped orchestrate the assassination
4. That Turning Point USA knew about the assassination plot, participated in it, and it covered up
5. That his widow, Erika Kirk is suspect in her husband's death
6. That the French DGSE and/or Foreign Legion were behind Kirk's assassination
7. That the Israeli Mossad and/or Sayeret Matkal were behind Kirk's assassination
Does her evidence overturn the established narrative? Stay tuned!
*Original unedited debate was hosted and published by Patrick-Bet David on his PBD Podcast
5
6 comments
Candy vs. Andy
skool.com/libertypolitics
Talk politics with others who care, in live calls and community posts. Share your views, ask questions, or just listen in.
Leaderboard (30-day)
1
🔥
+1014
2
+753
3
🔥
+581
4
🔥
+575
5
+533
Powered by