https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E_Em0b3gMJs

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D8_lXKRB5UU Tucker Carlson dares to ask the forbidden question about Nicolás Maduro that no one else in mainstream media will touch. Why the intense opposition? What are the real reasons behind the criticism? Tucker breaks it down

Here is the recording of our latest session. The world is not a courtroom. It is a contest of wills between rival syndicates. In our latest daily session, the group peeled back the diplomatic veneer of the Venezuelan operation to reveal the machinery underneath. The prevailing insight was grim but clear. International law is a fiction we tell ourselves to sleep at night. Some argued that the globe is actually run by gangs. The United Nations is simply a meeting of the families. The reason the "credentialed class" fails—why the Bidens and Macrons flounder—is that they mistake the world for a faculty lounge. They bring a syllabus to a knife fight. Trump, conversely, operates with the instinct of a construction boss. He understands that geopolitics is a dirty business of leverage, threats, and transactions. He does not ask for a permission slip from the HR department before taking down a rival boss. This view met fierce resistance. Leslie argued for the necessity of the "Rule of Law." She contended that power without procedure is just tyranny by another name. If the US President ignores Congress and installs leaders based solely on American profit, he becomes indistinguishable from the dictators he topples. The collective response was cold. The room countered that a President is a fiduciary, not a humanitarian. His sole moral duty is to the American citizen. When the enemy is a narco-terrorist axis linking Caracas to Tehran, the demand for "proper paperwork" is a suicide pact. The group concluded that in a world of gangsters, you do not survive by acting like a monk. Most political discourse is noise designed to distract you. Our daily sessions focus strictly on the signal. We dissect the moves of global players with the cold detachment of an autopsy. Step inside the room where the real conversation happens. View the calendar at this link to join our next discussion: https://www.skool.com/libertypolitics/calendar

The most efficient weapon for dismantling the West is deadlier than the Islamic bullet. It is the naturalized ballot. We fixate on the violence, tracking crime rates and terror plots, but this focus blinds us to the real siege. The ultimate threat posed by mass migration from Islamic regions is not just the shattering of peace. It is the rewriting of the code. When the West imports millions from culturally inferior nations, it does not just absorb people. It absorbs a rival operating system. We hand these populations the right to vote, allowing them to inject their values directly into the legislative blood of the state. A bullet can only kill a man. A ballot, cast in sufficient numbers, kills the very idea of the West. As an Iranian who fled the suffocating grip of this ideology, I see the very nightmare I escaped being rebuilt by your own laws. It is not integration. It is total extinction. Knowing the truth in isolation changes nothing. The sheer weight of the opposing vote requires a counter-weight of equal magnitude. One voice is a statistic, but a united front is a blockade. We are aggregating our numbers here to create that force here. The specific tactics will follow, but first, we must assemble the army.