User
Write something
Pinned
Mom Holding Government Accountable
https://www.givesendgo.com/CivilRight101 Hello Members, Tracy here, It is not my intent to request money but I need your help supporting my efforts to hold state actors accountable in Federal Court! Any contributions at all are appreciated! This case involves events from 2017-2023 where a city issued arrest warrants and collection notices during a pending appeal. The county court (state court) found in June 2023 that "the delay in this matter violated the Defendant's Constitutional right to Due Process" and that "this should not have happened as this matter is on appeal and has been for over 5 years. Key Facts: - (State) County court ordered amendments to charges in April 2018, but the court found the city "decided against filing the Amended Affidavits" for over 5 years - In April 2023, I filed a motion documenting the arrest warrants and collections during appeal, plus the court orders to amend complaints - Instead of amending complaints, stopping collections, stopping arrest warrants, or responding to pleadings, the city filed a motion seeking 18 months imprisonment and immediate trial - County court then ruled my rights were violated and ordered arrest warrants "should be stricken immediately" - Defense did not appeal, motion to reconsider, or respond to the state court findings of constitutional violation. - Independent auditors issued identical warnings for 9 consecutive years (2015-2023) about "a single employee in charge of fine collections, docket entry, and warrant issuances" and "risking public funds" Current Federal Case Status: I have filed a 42 USC 1983 Federal Civil Rights Case for several constitutional violations that were found by the State Court & includes additional information I have found on my own. https://www.courtlistener.com/.../arnold-v-city-of-guntown/ Defendants filed their answer without filing a 12(b)(6) motion or any pre answer motion! This means I am in a very good position.
Pinned
Just Released: Civil Rights 101: Your Litigation Starter Kit
Dear Members, I'm excited to announce the release of our newest educational resource: "Civil Rights 101: Your Litigation Starter Kit" designed specifically for those seeking to understand and navigate the complex landscape of civil rights litigation. This concise handbook provides a foundational education covering civil rights that we all should have had by the time we reached adulthood. What This Educational Resource Offers: This structured handbook provides an accessible framework for understanding civil rights litigation concepts: - Historical Context: An examination of § 1983's development from its Reconstruction-era origins to its current role in constitutional enforcement - Case Assessment Concepts: Practical frameworks for evaluating potential claims, identifying constitutional violations, and understanding defendant selection considerations - Jurisdictional Information: Clear explanation of federal versus state court considerations with procedural requirements and venue selection principles - Complaint Drafting Guidance: Language approaches and formatting suggestions that focus on constitutional violations while addressing potential immunity defenses - Liability Frameworks: Explanations of individual, supervisory, municipal, and conspiracy liability theories in the civil rights context - Immunity Defense Concepts: Educational overview of qualified immunity, judicial immunity, and sovereign immunity defenses, including relevant exceptions Additional Learning Resources: The guide also includes: - Examples of constitutional claim language for various constitutional provisions - Overview of documentation considerations in civil rights cases - Explanation of burden-shifting concepts in civil rights litigation - Information about pro se litigation standards when proceeding without counsel This educational resource is designed to help you understand the landscape of civil rights litigation whether you're interested in excessive force cases, search and seizure issues, free speech considerations, or due process concepts.
Municipal claim form notice
I am currently working on my lawsuit against a municipality. I first have to send them a claim form within 6 months. Does anyone have a copy of one to use as a sample? Also how long after sending the claim form did you file the lawsuit?
Sadly I had to remove a member
The gentleman continued to very artfully (very similar to how Marshall Applewhite convinced the Heaven's Gate Cult to take their own lives; I will make a post on that as it is something we are all vulnerable to) present a theory of law without any caselaw supporting his theory of law. Proving with caselaw is one of our rules and I try not to be ultra-strict about it, but this was too much. All of us need to focus and do what the winners do and avoid what the losers did. I've completed verification research on the theories being promoted. EVERY SINGLE FEDERAL CIRCUIT has explicitly rejected these theories as "patently frivolous." VERIFIED FACTS: - United States v. Benabe (7th Cir.): "These theories should be rejected summarily" - United States v. Mundt (6th Cir.): "completely without merit and patently frivolous" - Henry v. Fernandez Rundle (11th Cir.): "no arguable legal basis" REAL CONSEQUENCES: - Court sanctions: $5,000+ penalties - Criminal prosecution for tax theories - Destruction of legitimate legal cases - Contempt of court charges NO FEDERAL COURT has EVER accepted: - "Strawman" theories - Article IV § 3 "status correction" - "Equity citizenship" claims - "Dual jurisdiction" theories These theories have a documented 100% FAILURE RATE. If someone cannot provide a published federal court decision (or state court) supporting their claims, DO NOT FOLLOW THEIR ADVICE. DO NOT FOLLOW MY ADVICE, as I am not an attorney; I only try to educate so you can make decisions for yourself like an adult. Caselaw trailing gift: US v Mundt (29 F.3d 233) On the merits, defendant argues that the District Court lacked jurisdiction over him because he is solely a resident of the state of Michigan and not a resident of any “federal zone” and is therefore not subject to federal income tax laws. This argument is completely without merit and patently frivolous. To put the argument to rest, we quote the following from a Tenth Circuit opinion in which the court was responding to an identical tax-protester argument.
Hello Everyone
I am new here! I am Pro Se against a foreclosure sale in a nonjudicial state, CO. Working my best for default judgement in Federal court. I have gone through the administrative process and the plaintiffs were found in default. I have submitted a conditional acceptance for value letter, that they did not respond to. I know that the note has been securitized and can provide the proof. Is there anything else I should include to ensure the win? Your assistance is appreciated.
1-30 of 61
powered by
LawGeeks.Org
skool.com/lawgeeksorg-9513
Our truly and sincerely held mission is to teach law so that individuals can make their own decisions and take their matters before the judges. Deut19
Build your own community
Bring people together around your passion and get paid.
Powered by