There are 2 dispositive motions in play awaiting the District Judge's ruling. Tracy's rule 56 (served first) partial summary judgement on official liability only and Defense's 12(c) judgement on the pleadings. I am considering doing a full breakdown of the case filings and offer my opinion. Let us know what you think. https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69650770/arnold-v-city-of-guntown/

Dear Members, I'm excited to announce the release of our newest educational resource: "Civil Rights 101: Your Litigation Starter Kit" designed specifically for those seeking to understand and navigate the complex landscape of civil rights litigation. This concise handbook provides a foundational education covering civil rights that we all should have had by the time we reached adulthood. What This Educational Resource Offers: This structured handbook provides an accessible framework for understanding civil rights litigation concepts: - Historical Context: An examination of § 1983's development from its Reconstruction-era origins to its current role in constitutional enforcement - Case Assessment Concepts: Practical frameworks for evaluating potential claims, identifying constitutional violations, and understanding defendant selection considerations - Jurisdictional Information: Clear explanation of federal versus state court considerations with procedural requirements and venue selection principles - Complaint Drafting Guidance: Language approaches and formatting suggestions that focus on constitutional violations while addressing potential immunity defenses - Liability Frameworks: Explanations of individual, supervisory, municipal, and conspiracy liability theories in the civil rights context - Immunity Defense Concepts: Educational overview of qualified immunity, judicial immunity, and sovereign immunity defenses, including relevant exceptions Additional Learning Resources: The guide also includes: - Examples of constitutional claim language for various constitutional provisions - Overview of documentation considerations in civil rights cases - Explanation of burden-shifting concepts in civil rights litigation - Information about pro se litigation standards when proceeding without counsel This educational resource is designed to help you understand the landscape of civil rights litigation whether you're interested in excessive force cases, search and seizure issues, free speech considerations, or due process concepts.

https://www.givesendgo.com/CivilRight101 Hello Members, Tracy here, It is not my intent to request money but I need your help supporting my efforts to hold state actors accountable in Federal Court! Any contributions at all are appreciated! This case involves events from 2017-2023 where a city issued arrest warrants and collection notices during a pending appeal. The county court (state court) found in June 2023 that "the delay in this matter violated the Defendant's Constitutional right to Due Process" and that "this should not have happened as this matter is on appeal and has been for over 5 years. Key Facts: - (State) County court ordered amendments to charges in April 2018, but the court found the city "decided against filing the Amended Affidavits" for over 5 years - In April 2023, I filed a motion documenting the arrest warrants and collections during appeal, plus the court orders to amend complaints - Instead of amending complaints, stopping collections, stopping arrest warrants, or responding to pleadings, the city filed a motion seeking 18 months imprisonment and immediate trial - County court then ruled my rights were violated and ordered arrest warrants "should be stricken immediately" - Defense did not appeal, motion to reconsider, or respond to the state court findings of constitutional violation. - Independent auditors issued identical warnings for 9 consecutive years (2015-2023) about "a single employee in charge of fine collections, docket entry, and warrant issuances" and "risking public funds" Current Federal Case Status: I have filed a 42 USC 1983 Federal Civil Rights Case for several constitutional violations that were found by the State Court & includes additional information I have found on my own. https://www.courtlistener.com/.../arnold-v-city-of-guntown/ Defendants filed their answer without filing a 12(b)(6) motion or any pre answer motion! This means I am in a very good position.

Dear Members, We're excited to announce the completion of our introductory ebook on federal civil rights litigation! This comprehensive resource provides essential knowledge on recognizing and pursuing constitutional violations through the federal court system. What You'll Learn: - Historical and legal foundations of civil rights protections - Understanding §1983 and Bivens claims - Jurisdictional requirements for federal civil rights cases - Proper pleading structures and procedural considerations Ready to test your current knowledge? Take our free assessment to discover what you already know and preview some of the valuable content you'll find in the full ebook: Federal Civil Rights Knowledge Assessment We developed this resource to equip you with the fundamental knowledge needed to identify potential constitutional violations and understand the framework for pursuing federal remedies. The publication process is underway, and we'll share details about access and availability soon! -Tracy and Bill

Go over to the Classroom feed at the top to find this material. It includes our template/formatting for professional looking and organized paperwork. It includes 70 select filings and exhibits from both the injured party and the police & city attorneys. We processed each PDF with OCR software, so that it is easier for you to copy & paste for your needs.