I am currently working on my lawsuit against a municipality. I first have to send them a claim form within 6 months. Does anyone have a copy of one to use as a sample? Also how long after sending the claim form did you file the lawsuit?

The gentleman continued to very artfully (very similar to how Marshall Applewhite convinced the Heaven's Gate Cult to take their own lives; I will make a post on that as it is something we are all vulnerable to) present a theory of law without any caselaw supporting his theory of law. Proving with caselaw is one of our rules and I try not to be ultra-strict about it, but this was too much. All of us need to focus and do what the winners do and avoid what the losers did. I've completed verification research on the theories being promoted. EVERY SINGLE FEDERAL CIRCUIT has explicitly rejected these theories as "patently frivolous." VERIFIED FACTS: - United States v. Benabe (7th Cir.): "These theories should be rejected summarily" - United States v. Mundt (6th Cir.): "completely without merit and patently frivolous" - Henry v. Fernandez Rundle (11th Cir.): "no arguable legal basis" REAL CONSEQUENCES: - Court sanctions: $5,000+ penalties - Criminal prosecution for tax theories - Destruction of legitimate legal cases - Contempt of court charges NO FEDERAL COURT has EVER accepted: - "Strawman" theories - Article IV § 3 "status correction" - "Equity citizenship" claims - "Dual jurisdiction" theories These theories have a documented 100% FAILURE RATE. If someone cannot provide a published federal court decision (or state court) supporting their claims, DO NOT FOLLOW THEIR ADVICE. DO NOT FOLLOW MY ADVICE, as I am not an attorney; I only try to educate so you can make decisions for yourself like an adult. Caselaw trailing gift: US v Mundt (29 F.3d 233) On the merits, defendant argues that the District Court lacked jurisdiction over him because he is solely a resident of the state of Michigan and not a resident of any “federal zone” and is therefore not subject to federal income tax laws. This argument is completely without merit and patently frivolous. To put the argument to rest, we quote the following from a Tenth Circuit opinion in which the court was responding to an identical tax-protester argument.

I am new here! I am Pro Se against a foreclosure sale in a nonjudicial state, CO. Working my best for default judgement in Federal court. I have gone through the administrative process and the plaintiffs were found in default. I have submitted a conditional acceptance for value letter, that they did not respond to. I know that the note has been securitized and can provide the proof. Is there anything else I should include to ensure the win? Your assistance is appreciated.

That the United States form, for many, and for most important purposes, a single nation, has not yet been denied. In war, we are one people. In making peace, we are one people. In all commercial regulations, we are one and the same people. In *414 many other respects, the American people are one, and the government which is alone capable of controlling and managing their interests in all these respects, is the government of the Union. It is their government, and in that character they have no other. America has chosen to be, in many respects, and to many purposes, a nation, and for all these purposes, her government is complete; to all these objects, it is competent. The people have declared, that in the exercise of all powers given for these objects, it is supreme. It can, then, in effecting these objects, legitimately control all individuals or governments within the American territory. Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. 264 ___________________________________________ The power of the State over the public property, is, at least, equal to that of an individual over his own; and particularly so, as to the navigable rivers in the State, which are, emphatically, the property of the people of the State, and subject to their authority, acting through the local Legislature.

Greetings swoop group! I need to file three motions in yhe 12th District Court of Sarasota Florida. They're extremely pick. iAnyone have a.template to share they will accept.? their state constitution has articles that prohibit me, in their courtroom as special friend representation. I'm going to challenge Then nd breaks off them. God's love rain Supreme over any construction of men. They're either going to be in heaven or put themselves in Hell by the time I'm finished! See my client on IG@Josegilberti2024 /@water.4.life.USA Sarasota City let's play games with me. The only time I played is if I know I'm going to win! Hopefully you all check it out and as soon as a podcast that are out covering his story that his wife is told. Any assistance will be greatly appreciate you I have all the details I need! Yes PS the judge sentenced into 15 years today. His due process has been violated so obviously that the entire case will be thrown out strictly on that alone. However I'm filing a motion 'lack of personal jurisdiction' and failure to provide a living man or woman for him to face as an accuser. The state for any living person lying as the corporation state is going to get fined and put in jail accordingly. Buckle up buttercups follow along if you care. Most of Chicago, Jen burner 💛💙💛💙