𝗜𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘁-𝗕𝗮𝘀𝗲𝗱 𝘃𝘀. 𝗜𝗺𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲-𝗕𝗮𝘀𝗲𝗱 𝗠𝗼𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 (If you want to skip below for strategies, please do) I've been thinking about why at times I can KNOW that something is important and IS actually important to me/in general, I can WANT to WANT to do the important thing, but something within me just struggles to get going. Even though the importance is high, the friction is also high. I've often talked about "knowing your why" and then knowing the why behind the why and I've also spoken about values and how all of this can help with taking steps towards accomplishing tasks/goals but sometimes even tapping into this may just not be enough. Sometimes we benefit from additional things to help support with follow through. So, I've reflected on my life and looked at how I've gone about doing things and I realized that a lot of what I accomplish is related to a few factors: interest, novelty, challenge, urgency, and/or utilizing external environmental structures to help me complete the goals and keep me on track. Importance /value /truth are still main variables, but I needed to use these other things to help mobilize me better. ---------- Some people are motivated primarily by interest: a task is easier to engage with when it has a level of novetly, when it's challenging, stimulating, urgent, meaningful in the moment, or offers immediate feedback. (shall we call it..dopamine centric?) Others can more readily mobilize around importance: a task needs to get done because it aligns with their values, responsibilities, or long-term goals, even when it’s boring or uncomfortable. Everyone uses both systems, but the balance matters. Interest-based motivation is influenced by novelty, curiosity, challenge, immediate reward, emotional engagement, and time pressure while importance-based motivation relies more heavily on goal representation, delayed rewards, planning, self-regulation, and the ability to tolerate low stimulation in service of a future outcome. **Sleep, stress, mood, task difficulty, executive functioning, and the environment can influence both.**

"What is hell? I maintain that it is the suffering of being unable to love." — The Brothers Karamazov Most of us can love and be loved. Hell is handing hurt and fear the permission to decide for you. What will you decide? Quote from the video: "When people choose love, they always choose right". dang... POLL: Do you allow yourself to love and be loved...fully?

We like to think communication is pretty straightforward: I think something → I say it → you hear it → you understand it. Boom! What more is there? But when we really break it down, there are a LOT of places where things can get lost along the way. First, there's what we're actually thinking or feeling. Sometimes we may not even have a clear understanding of that ourselves. Then there's what we 𝗜𝗡𝗧𝗘𝗡𝗗 to communicate. We might know what we mean in our heads, but translating that into actual words can be a whole different thing. Then there's what actually comes out of our mouths.😖 Sometimes what comes out isn't exactly what was in our heads. 😂 Maybe we didn't find the right words. Maybe we left something out. Maybe our tones communicated something we didn't intend. Then there's what the other person hears: And 𝗵𝗲𝗮𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘀𝗼𝗺𝗲𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗶𝘀𝗻'𝘁 𝗻𝗲𝗰𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗮𝗿𝗶𝗹𝘆 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝗮𝗺𝗲 𝗮𝘀 𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗻𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗶𝘁. What someone hears is going to be filtered through their own experiences, assumptions, emotions, expectations, etc. Then there's what they think they heard, followed by what they think it means. So we can end up with something like: 𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗜 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗸 → 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗜 𝗺𝗲𝗮𝗻 → 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗜 𝘀𝗮𝘆 → 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗵𝗲𝗮𝗿 → 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗸 𝗜 𝘀𝗮𝗶𝗱 → 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗺𝗲 𝘁𝗼 𝗺𝗲𝗮𝗻. That's a LOT of opportunities for the original message to get a little altered, lost in translation, misaligned from its original intent. A lot of opportunities for potential conflict or opportunity to clarify and gain better understanding. And that's not even accounting for things like tone, facial expressions, timing, texting vs. talking in person, someone's mood that day, types of communication (e.g. literal, abstract) or whatever else is happening in the background. So...this makes me think that sometimes when we're arguing, we're likely not even actually arguing about what the other person said! We're arguing about what WE THINK they said. So... the following statements become even more valuable as a result: Sender: “That's not what I meant. Let me try saying that differently.”