โญ Truth timeโ: has support quietly become conditional on outputโ
I keep noticing how often support in growth spaces is framed around visibility, frequency, and output โ how much you post, how often you comment, how consistently you show up publicly. I understand where that belief comes from. Momentum matters. Engagement matters. Consistency can help things grow. But Iโm starting to question what happens when those become the main measures of belonging. What does it mean for people who are part of multiple communities at once? People who are genuinely engaged, supportive, and invested โ but whose energy is spread across different spaces, relationships, and responsibilities? Does contribution only count when itโs concentrated in one place? Or can it still be real, meaningful support when itโs shared across many rooms? Iโm also thinking about quieter forms of contribution โ thoughtful replies, behind-the-scenes support, one-to-one conversations, or simply being present when it truly matters, rather than constantly visible. Is support still support if it only exists when someone is โonโ? If slowing down, resting, or redistributing energy is interpreted as disengagement? Whereโs the line between encouragement and pressure? Between building momentumโฆ and unintentionally creating environments where people feel they have to perform connection to remain included? For me, sustainable community has to allow for different rhythms and realities. Some seasons are focused. Others are shared across many spaces. Both can be honest, committed, and real. Belonging that lasts doesnโt disappear when someoneโs capacity shifts. It adapts. It trusts. It doesnโt keep score. I donโt have neat answers โ just questions I think are worth asking as more of us try to build communities that value people, not just output. What does meaningful support look like to you, beyond numbers?