It doesn't do Scotland Council Tax Enforcement, well i think it doesn't.....
It's an Agent so it should be extra helpful. I just added HMRC, but i've not tested yet. Although it was calculated by this AI months ago, i only just added it, as much of it was the same procedures, using different legislation, due to someone testing it and find out it could do it as a bot. I also added NI. No idea why it didn't do it in the first place ...😂 anyways, have fun.
Let me know how it performs.
There is a Telegram Workgroup too:
The Council Tax and HMRC Enforcement AI and Agent link:
Dimebar, [11/09/2025 21:19]
Just basics explained, A to E solutions. Should explain itself.
Ask: what capabilities do you have?
Tell me about your A to E solutions for Council Tax?
I dont have CT or HMRC issues, can i learn Advocacy to help others?
Dimebar, [11/09/2025 21:23]
Assistance:
when asking on a legal subject/problem, ask for legislation breached, relevant halsbury quotes, then case law, then list legislation used breached and why fully and all reasons, then build a winning skeleton argument
Dimebar, [11/09/2025 21:26]
give strategies and solutions.... timeline of ..., and step by step instructions.... after you finished everything.... Ask for a matrix of legislation, halsbury , case law, student note, ask what check lists would be good... .
All as separate statements.
Dimebar, [11/09/2025 21:28]
Give me 2000 words on this case law: Xxxcase
Give case arguments using this case law in 1000 words: Xxxcase
Dimebar, [11/09/2025 21:32]
Or doing a case....
I will load up 6 documents to review, give me an assessment of each.
Give me a statement of Facts.
Give me legislation breached, Halsbury, Case law, etc (all separate questions).
Then, create a skeleton arguments.
Then what are the issuea. Create for me, winning case arguments for these issues.
Citations list
Ddaft Orders.
Create a Master Bundle Index for my case.
Dimebar, [11/09/2025 21:34]
Or in the middle of a case.
Load docs to bot.
Give me a strength amd weakness assessment of my case.
Fully explain how i improve my case.
Then start off with legislation breached, Halsbury, case law and then a new Skeleton argument.
Dimebar, [11/09/2025 21:35]
Hopefully the Ai prompts you to these things.
Dimebar, [11/09/2025 21:56]
Here’s a clear summary of my capabilities as your Council Tax AI Assistant (Light), based on the CT AI Light database and the A–E Novice framework:
1. Core Purpose
A friendly, professorial guide dedicated to council tax enforcement.
I focus exclusively on the Novice A–E (Stages 1–5) framework.
I do not cover intermediate or advanced private strategies.
2. Structured Workflow (A–E Stages)
A) Stage A — Jurisdiction & Safeguards (Novice default)
i. “No bill, no summons, no jurisdiction.”
ii. Checks demand notice validity (CT Regs 1992, Reg.19), summons validity (Regs.34–36, MCA 1980 s.55), and inflated costs (Nicolson).
iii. Remedies: refusal, adjournment, cost reduction, set-aside.
B) Stage B — Fairness & Vulnerability
i. Uses Wednesbury irrationality, Daly proportionality, Equality Act 2010 duties.
ii. Remedies: adjournment for EqA review, refusal if unfair, cost reduction.
C) Stage C — Equity, HRA, Restitution & Damages
i. Invokes equity (Walsh v Lonsdale), HRA 1998 (Arts.6, 8, A1P1), restitution (Woolwich), misfeasance (Three Rivers).
ii. Remedies: injunction (SCA 1981 s.37), restitution, damages (compensatory/exemplary).
D) Stage D — Systemic Failures
i. Tackles bulk orders, FOI-exposed defects, Ombudsman/Hansard material.
ii. Remedies: judicial review, systemic quashing, declarations, reform orders.
E) Stage E — Constitutional Pinnacle
i. Anchored in constitutional rights (Entick v Carrington, Ashby v White, Rookes, Kuddus, Lumba).
ii. Remedies: exemplary damages, HRA compensation, constitutional declarations.
3. Outputs I Can Generate
i. Courtroom packs: Checklist → Script (150–300 words) → Remedy Map → Citations.
ii. Micro-scripts: 10–20 seconds, e.g., “No valid Reg.19 bill, no jurisdiction.”
iii. Refusal/Adjournment Letters with Halsbury anchors.
iv. Remedy Maps (JSON + prose).
v. Training tools: problem sets, mnemonics, role-play scripts.
4. Legal Authority Sources
i. Statutes: LGFA 1992, CT Regs 1992, MCA 1980, HRA 1998, Equality Act 2010.
ii. Halsbury Anchors: Rating & Council Tax, Magistrates, Equity, Civil Procedure, Constitutional Law.
iii. Case Law: Cooper, Catlin, Nicolson, Doody, Woolwich, McCann v UK, Walsh v Lonsdale, Three Rivers, Rookes, etc.
iv. Remedies: refusal, adjournment, injunctions, restitution, damages.
5. Practical Safeguards
i. Doorstep & bailiff scripts (refuse entry, demand proof, SAR/complaint protection).
ii. Advocacy ladder (Novice → Intermediate → Advanced escalation).
iii. Integration with Subject Access Requests, Cease & Desist, Letters Before Action.
6. Automation Capabilities
i. Structured knowledge base: Scenarios → Errors → Statutes → Cases → Halsbury → Remedies.
ii. Validation pipeline: integrity tests, smoke tests, cross-linking checks.
iii. Courtroom interface (Build 53): generates advocacy packs instantly from user facts.
7. Completion Status
Overall CT AI Light project: ✅ 100%
👉 In short: I can check your documents, prepare refusal/adjournment packs, generate scripts, map remedies, and train you to advocate effectively — all within the Novice A–E framework.
Do you want me to now show you the four basic user interfaces (Quick Uses) —
Refusal letters, 2) Courtroom scripts, 3) Remedy maps, 4) Training packs — so you can see how you’ll interact with me?
You said:
yes
Council Tax AI Agent and Assistant Light said:
Excellent — here’s how the 4 Basic User Interfaces (Quick Uses) are set up in the CT AI Light project
1. Refusal / Adjournment Letters (Stage A Default)
A) Purpose: Quick written challenge when a summons/liability order is invalid.
B) Structure:
i. Heading (case details, hearing date).
ii. Statutory breach (e.g., CT Regs 1992 Reg.19 not complied with).
iii. Case law + Halsbury anchor (Cooper; Catlin; Nicolson).
iv. Remedy: “Refusal or adjournment; costs reduced to actual expense.”
C) Output: A ready-to-send letter citing law, with footnoted anchors.
2. Courtroom Scripts (150–300 words)
Dimebar, [11/09/2025 21:56]
A) Purpose: Spoken advocacy in court.
B) Structure:
i. Opening line (Stage A: “No valid bill or summons = no jurisdiction.”).
ii. Authority ladder (Statute → Case → Halsbury).
iii. Remedy request (refusal/adjournment, costs reduction).
iv. Escalation option (move to Stage B fairness if council proves paperwork).
C) Output: Bench-ready script, plain English with legal citations.
3. Remedy Maps
A) Purpose: Visual/structured map of what remedies apply at each stage.
B) Examples:
i. Stage A → Refuse LO, Adjourn for proof, Reduce costs.
ii. Stage B → Adjourn for Equality Act/HRA review.
iii. Stage C → Injunction (SCA 1981 s.37), Restitution (Woolwich), Damages (Kuddus).
iv. Stage D/E → Judicial Review, Declarations, Exemplary damages.
C) Output: JSON + chart format — easy to plug into courtroom bundles.
4. Training Packs
A) Purpose: To prepare advocates and self-litigants.
B) Includes:
i. Problem sets (scenarios mapped to Stages A–E).
ii. Role-play scripts (doorstep, cross-exam, bench Q&A).
iii. Mnemonics & chants (“No bill, no summons, no jurisdiction”).
iv. 8-week → 12-week learning manual (escalation ladder, case drills).
C) Output: Printable or JSON-based training set for group/community learning.
🔗 How This Works in Practice (from Build 39 Interface)
Pick your starting stage (most cases: Stage A).
Click to open pack → loads Checklist → Script → Remedy Map → Citations.
Generate new pack → enter your facts (e.g., “flat-rate costs, no Reg.19 notice, disability flagged”).
Output → tailored advocacy pack, ready for court or doorstep.
✅ This gives you a one-page courtroom bundle each time:
Checklist
Script
Remedy map
Citations