Dave DimeBar

We are making waves, :-).

Hi Gang, of course we could be the new crazy gang, lol. But of course we are not crazy, :-). Well this is what peter was mentioning last night. As in our S.A.R Campaign on Supermarkets. This just popped up on my fb page, American talking about it, :-). https://www.facebook.com/reel/682316340970019

0 likes • 2d

😍

Shaun Coombes

2d •

Calendar not working?

Hi , I am trying to access videos from the calendar but they all say unavailable? I s there tech gremlins or updates happening?

1 like • 2d

streamyard you can usually see for a week @Peter Wilson

Peter Bayliss

3d •

SAR supermarket

Morning, I contacted Morrisons supermarket for a copy of my data filmed at the self service till, they have replied saying there was a technical fault with the cameras that day so no footage was captured. Obviously a convenient excuse, do I still have a claim ?

0 likes • 3d

Let’s break this down carefully using the Peter Wilson Court Bundle model. A. Legal Foundation 1. Right to Data 2. CCTV Failures 3. Remedies B. Procedural Route 1. First Step – ICO Complaint 2. Court Claim 3. Evidence C. Practical Wilson-Style Guidance (Plain English for LiPs) - If footage truly never existed – no compensation claim for “missing CCTV” alone, because no data = no breach. - If they deleted it unlawfully (e.g., deliberately wiped or failed to maintain CCTV properly) – then you may claim distress damages. - Key move: Write back to Morrisons asking for: This puts them on notice that you are considering escalation. D. Conclusion 👉 Do you still have a claim? - Not for “failure to provide” alone if footage never existed. - But you may still claim if you can show: 👉 Next steps: - Escalate to the ICO. - If unsatisfied, consider a small claim under Part 7 CPR for distress damages (usually £100–£1,500 depending on impact, see Vidal-Hall v Google).

Feb 24 •

Treason for the Data Access and Use Act. More files added.

This new Data Law, and as i got into it, it seemed to be a fascist concept, where Government and Corporations work together against the People. This ended in an outline of a Treason Skeleton Argument, for whoever proposed this Bill. Scroll down to files dated: 11th March 2025 HWM dbar GPT Treason Case Skeleton Arguments, Case Arguments, etc 14-17

New comment 3d ago

3 likes • Jun 21

@Rafal Suliga There are always holes, work arounds, but maybe better if you have a US company, or other like BVI, with Bank Accounts there, with private healthcare, etc etc. This is digital slavery remember! Europe has already lost. They want every important part of your life digitised centrally, so you are super super super safe, honest...🙄......😳😳 ...and, it will save you 6 minutes at the airport apparently...🤪 They will blame the illegal Migrants from the wars that they illegally started!!... that they then let in for years, in order to do this = #ClownWorld

1 like • 3d

@Peter Wilson data laws and violations

Clare Taylor

Jul 2 •

Data controller v processor

In my case the bank is the controller and the solicitors are the processors. I know this as when I submitted the DSARs, the solicitors' forwarded it the bank and the bank responded. They did not respond in full (no data processing agreement etc). My N1 now needs to concentrate on the fact that the solicitors did not upload their processor obligations, did not supply the data processing agreement, impact assessment, DPA. Anyone had success in holding a processor to account? How did you navigate the particulars of the claim etc?

2 likes • Jul 2

@Abigail White from the original post. 😍