I just got an email from Apify letting me know that an actor I've used, specifically one for scraping Apollo.io, has been shut down for "compliance reasons." This isn't just an inconvenience; it's a critical warning sign for any of us building businesses that rely on data from third-party platforms. Let's break down what this really means. When a platform like Apify removes a tool for "compliance reasons," it's almost always a legal or quasi-legal issue. It means the tool was likely violating the target website's rules in a way that creates an unacceptable risk for the platform and its users. This is a real-world example of a major operational risk for AI businesses, especially those in lead generation, market research, or data enrichment. The bottom line is this: While scraping is technically easy, it is not a legally or commercially stable strategy for acquiring core business data. This move by Apify is part of a larger trend of platforms cracking down on unauthorized data extraction. -- Attorney Tatyana

🔥 Many recruiters don’t realize their job descriptions might carry hidden bias—pushing away great candidates. So I built an automation that: 1️⃣ Catches new job descriptions as they’re written 2️⃣ Runs an AI bias analysis 3️⃣ Suggests a rewritten inclusive version 4️⃣ Logs results in Google Sheets 5️⃣ Emails HR with the report instantly ⚡ This means every JD can be reviewed and fixed before it ever gets published. 👉 Engagement questions for Skool: Would you trust AI-driven inclusivity checks in your hiring workflow? Should the candidate-facing version always be the inclusive rewrite, or should HR still approve first?