Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
What is this?
Less
More

Owned by Nick

a casual, no-fluff online room for owners and serious starters who want to get unstuck, bounce ideas around, and turn small business into real income.

“Learn how to use tax strategy and cost segregation to turn commercial real estate deals into more after‑tax cash flow.”

Memberships

Skool Owners Network

50 members • $9/month

AI Workshop Lite

14.7k members • Free

AI Bits and Pieces

471 members • Free

Legal Launchpad for AIpreneurs

228 members • Free

Skool Speedrun

12k members • Free

Growth Gap Destiny Builders

42 members • Free

AI Automation Agency Hub

290.5k members • Free

The Real Estate Academy

3.4k members • Free

Future Proof Real Estate

9.9k members • Free

199 contributions to AI Automation Society
Do you offer voice AI receptionists?
(today’s your lucky day) If you’re an AI Agency owner offering voice AI receptionists, this post is gonna help you sign A LOT of clients. So let's get into it… First, let’s start with what you DON’T want to offer: “Fire your receptionist and save $50k per year” “24/7 coverage on inbound calls” These offers might sound good, but in reality, they’re scaring away business owners… Here’s why: Inbound calls are likely the primary source of generating leads and, therefore, revenue for the business owner… So installing an AI receptionist, which they know nothing about, is far too RISKY because it controls and therefore affects how they generate leads and revenue. This is why business owners happily pay $50k per year for a receptionist in the first place… And if they’re not happy with their human receptionist, they would rather hire a new human receptionist than install an AI receptionist, even at 1/10 the cost… Why? RISK. “Okay, so it’s too risky to replace their human receptionist for an AI one, sh*t, what do we do?” Well, what's the problem with a human receptionist? They only work from 9-5. They can claim those hours. Thats not a problem. But what happens when the human receptionist isn’t working during those hours and inbound leads call? Ahhhaaa! Those calls go to voicemail. Leading to a big problem: missed clients from missed calls. They won’t trade the calls their human receptionist takes, but do you think they’ll trade the calls going to voicemail? Of course they will! Because now you’re not offering an overhaul, you’re offering an upgrade. An upgrade where they can only capture MORE calls, leading to MORE clients, with ZERO risk. (boy oh boy, what an offer) So instead of offering to: "Eliminate missed clients from missed calls" Shift the offer to: "Eliminate missed clients from missed calls during after-hours” Then once they see it works and trust is earned → upsell additional features or the whole package. The AI Agency owners I’m working with offering voice AI receptionists are crushing it right now with this offer.
Do you offer voice AI receptionists?
1 like • 6d
Love this angle, Daniel. Framing voice AI as a way to **recover** and convert missed calls instead of “replacing receptionists” lands much better with owners. The after-hours + missed-calls-to-bookings positioning is exactly where I’m seeing the strongest buy-in from local service businesses too.
0 likes • 1d
@Ai Kang
Taking a day off from Tax Logic… to fix a different kind of problem.
Most people don’t see this side of my life — but I’ve been dealing with MS for years, and finding reliable caregiver support has been one of the toughest parts. Between missed appointments, last‑minute schedule changes, and constant confusion, I realized *the system is broken*. So today, I’m stepping away from tax work to start building something new — a *smart scheduling system* for home‑care and service businesses. Because here’s the reality: > “Do your clients sit at home wondering if anyone’s actually going to show up today? > Your schedulers live on the phone, your caregivers get last‑minute texts, and everyone is burned out.” That ends now. I’m building a system with: - One live schedule for everyone. - Automatic matching of caregivers and clients. - Real‑time updates for staff and families. - Fewer no‑shows. Less windshield time. More trust. If your schedule is running you instead of you running it, let’s fix your week. **Book a free 20‑minute schedule audit — link in comments.
2 likes • 13d
@Hicham Char do you sleep?
1 like • 1d
@Muskan Ahlawat A Sneak peek how I use AI to vibe code my thoughts for my business is with Tax Logic CRE
Your AI service isn't the problem…
This is. (simple fix inside) If you’ve been following my posts, you know I share a lot of strategies and tactics to help you get more leads and clients for your AI services… But today, we’re gonna go a bit deeper as to why your calendar might not be as full as you like, and why business owners aren’t biting. You might think it is, but the problem isn’t your AI service… It’s how early you are to the market. In 95% of cases, business owners aren’t choosing other AI service providers over you. They’re actually not choosing anyone… Why? Because they don’t understand what AI even is. When your prospect has no mental shelf to put you on, they don't know what you do… Let alone why it matters. Cluelessness is the problem. And it’s the hidden cost of being early to any market. So here’s the shift you want to make in your messaging: • Name the prospects’ pain points in familiar terms • Anchor your service to what prospects get • Position AI as an upgrade, NOT a revolution (big one) And unbutton any jargon because it chokes your message. Here’s an example: ✖️ “Harness cutting-edge AI solutions to drive transformative data hygiene and strategic document optimization across the enterprise landscape.” I mean, come on… nobody is buying that. ✔ "If your team is spending hours cleaning up spreadsheets, our AI solution will handle that in the background to keep them focused on bigger objectives.” The service layer of AI is starting to accelerate… But the marketing layer hasn’t caught up yet. Which means all you need to do is not preach ‘revolutionary’ solutions. Just define their bottlenecks and offer to solve them. When the dust settles, the AI Agencies who dominate won't have the most sophisticated solutions. They'll be the ones who built the mental shelves prospects can place their service on. Be clear. Not clever. __ I hope this helps, Dan 🤝
Your AI service isn't the problem…
3 likes • 2d
Totally nailed it here, Dan. The “mental shelf” idea is spot on—most owners aren’t comparing AI agencies, they’re just trying to figure out what the heck AI even is and where it fits in their world. Framing AI as an upgrade to problems they already recognize (time drain, messy data, manual work) instead of some abstract revolution is the cheat code. Really appreciate the before/after copy examples too; they make it crystal clear how small wording shifts can be the difference between “cool jargon” and “take my money.” This is the kind of clarity that’ll quietly mint the next wave of AI agencies.
NEED vibe coding ASAP human interpretation AKA make $$$
I don’t just need “vibe coding.” I need human‑level interpretation of what I actually want built—ASAP. Translate messy ideas into clear prompts that ship real results and make money, not more noise. If you’re tired of “vibes” and want real outcomes, drop a comment with what you’re trying to build and your niche. I’ll reply with one concrete AI workflow you can use this week to move closer to your next dollar.
3 likes • 2d
And I'm not into the money
3 likes • 2d
I'm donating my posts use ai to interpret and comprehend if you can't
Mistake by beginners(automation builder's)
Start with responsibility, not intelligence The right way to build an agent is to define its responsibility before its intelligence. Ask yourself: What is this agent allowed to decide on its own? Most beginners give agents too much power too early. That’s how systems become unpredictable. A good agent has a narrow role: one decision, one outcome, clear boundaries. Intelligence only works when responsibility is constrained. Otherwise, you’re just outsourcing chaos. :-- which point is more good? :--- more suggestions to improve? :----
5 likes • 4d
Muskan, that line ‘Start with responsibility, not intelligence’ really nails where most beginner agents go wrong – they chase ‘smart’ before they define ‘in charge of what?’. Narrow responsibility, clear decision rights, and a simple escalation rule turn an agent from a chaos machine into a reliable teammate. I’ve found that when I force myself to answer, ‘Exactly what is this agent allowed to decide without me?’ the design gets safer, simpler, and way easier to explain to clients.
3 likes • 3d
@Frank van Bokhorst Smart!!
1-10 of 199
Nick Coppola
6
786points to level up
@nick-coppola-9225
45+ years in businesses & CRE, Tax Logic™ was born—putting tax incentives upfront in the proforma to make CRE deals clearer & stronger. ULI Member.

Active 14h ago
Joined Nov 13, 2025
Charlotte, NC
Powered by